Genetic Characterization and Growth Promotion Mechanisms of Burkholderia vietnamiensis Isolated from Rice Cultivars in Peru

Abstract

Introduction/Background

Burkholderia is a versatile bacterial genus, and from a biotechnological point of view, it is a source of diverse secondary metabolites with enormous application potential, especially in agriculture.

Objective

This study aimed to isolate diazotrophic Burkholderia bacteria-associated rice roots and study the genetic and PGPR diversity among strains and the effect of their inoculation in two rice cultivars.

Methods

Strains were isolated using nitrogen-free semisolid media and tested by specific amplification of the recA gene. The production of auxins, siderophores, phosphate solubilization, and antagonism against phytopathogenic fungi was evaluated, and finally, their inoculation into two rice varieties was also examined.

Results

Only 5.13% of the isolated strains were positive for the amplification of the recA gene with Burkholderia-specific primers. Sequence analysis showed high similarity with Burkholderia vietnamiensis. These strains produced auxins in tryptophan-supplemented broth (up to 13.98 µg mL-1), siderophores (up to 139.52%), phosphate solubilization (up to 15.99 mg PO4 mL-1), as well as antibiotic and antagonistic capacities against five pathogenic fungi of rice. These strains increased the vigor index in two rice cultivars compared to the non-inoculated or non-fertilized treatment. The antibiotic and antifungal activities of B. vietnamiensis strains against two pathogenic fungi, Nakataea sigmoidea and Nigrospora oryzae, are described for the first time.

Conclusion

Due to the taxonomic affinity of our strains within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, their direct use in agriculture is not recommended; however, further research is required to exploit their biotechnological potential for the synthesis of useful metabolites.

Keywords: Antagonism, auxin production, nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, recA, siderophores.

1. INTRODUCTION

Burkholderia sensu lato (s.l.) [1] is a group of Gram-negative bacteria that are ubiquitous in different ecological niches and belong to the subphylum β-proteobacteria. Currently, by conducting phylogenetic analyses of conserved genes and comparative genomics, Burkholderia s.l. is classified into 7 new genera: Burkholderia sensu stricto (s.s.), Caballeronia [2], Paraburkholderia [3], Robbsia [4], Mycetohabitans, Trinickia [5], and Pararobbsia [6]. Within the genus Burkholderia, the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) comprises a group of species from different ecological niches and metabolic versatility [7]. It is characterized by mobility, strictly aerobic oxygen requirement, and great metabolic versatility due to the diversity of ecological niches it occupies [8]. It includes phytobeneficial species that promote plant growth, such as B. ambifaria [9], B. catarinensis [10], B. orbicola [11], and B. vietnamiensis [12], as antagonists of phytopathogenic fungi and producers of metabolites of biotechnological interest [13, 14]. Burkholderia isolates have enormous biotechnological potential, as many strains are producers of hydrolytic enzymes and bioactive substances that promote plant growth and health and degrade several recalcitrant pollutants [15-17]. Some members of the Bcc have also been reported as opportunistic pathogens in humans and animals [16, 18], preventing their use as bioinoculants in the field. Plants have co-evolved with various microorganisms, allowing them to survive in hostile environmental conditions. This association between plants and microorganisms takes place at the level of the rhizosphere, endosphere, and/or phyllosphere [19]. The relationships between plants and Burkholderia sensu stricto can be mutualistic or pathogenic. Mutualistic or phytobeneficial relationships are usually associated at the rhizosphere level [4, 20, 21] or at the endosphere level [22-24]. Among the phytobeneficial Burkholderia sensu stricto, B. vietnamiensis [25] is considered a diazotroph characterized by a mutualistic relationship with Oryza sativa and considered a model bacterium for growth promotion in rice [12, 26]. Several studies have reported that B. vietnamiensis strains promote plant growth through direct mechanisms, such as the production of phytohormones, siderophores, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, and nitrogen fixation, and indirect promotion mechanisms, such as biocontrol associated with the production of metabolites [27, 28]. B. vietnamiensis has been reported as a diazotroph associated with Ficus tikoua [28], Ipomoea batatas [29], and Populus trichocarpa [30] and is frequently found in rice [31-36]. The interactions between B. vietnamiensis and rice are very competent and persistent in the rhizosphere, Synthesizing a large number of secondary metabolites and expressing direct and indirect growth mechanisms [12]. Recently, in a study [37], it was demonstrated that B. vietnamiensis could inhibit root-knot nematode on watermelon by modifying the rhizosphere microbial community. There is evidence for the growth-promoting potential of B. vietnamiensis in rice [20, 31, 34]. Recently, it has been reported that B. vietnamiensis improved the growth of rice seedlings, enhanced root development, and increased nitrogen mobilisation and assimilation [20]. Unfortunately, these phytobeneficial species isolated from the rhizosphere and endosphere of plants could not be used as inoculants on a commercial scale due to a moratorium imposed in the 1990s on the grounds that they could pose a health risk [15]. However, in recent years, there has been an increase in the number of new Burkholderia species that are beneficial to plants but are not isolated from clinical sources. For this reason, there is an urgent need to develop new strategies to reduce the use of nitrogenous fertilizers, which can be addressed through the study of phytobeneficial Burkholderia associated with rice cultivation in the San Martin region. It is important to study the genetic diversity among Burkholderia species and explore their taxonomy, especially to distinguish strains with phytobeneficial potential from those with opportunistic pathogenic capacity. In addition, considering the diversity and identity of phytobeneficial Burkholderia strains, we selected strains that enable better outcomes at a level of genomic resolution. The aims of this work were: 1) to isolate and select bacteria of the genus Burkholderia sensu stricto associated with rice roots grown in four valleys of the San Martín region, using specific molecular markers, 2) to study genetic diversity and the phylogenetic relationship among Burkholderia sensu stricto strains, and 3) to evaluate the direct and indirect growth promotion mechanisms of B. vietnamiensis strains and their response to inoculation in two local rice cultivars.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Collection of Rice Samples

Root samples of different rice varieties were collected from the Bajo Mayo, Alto Mayo, Alto Huallaga, and Central Huallaga valleys in the San Martín-Perú region. Root samples were obtained from plants at the tillering stage, according to the procedure described by Ji et al. [38]. Root samples were processed, coded, and transported in falcon tubes (50 mL) at 4°C. Georeferencing data and cultivation history were recorded for each sample.

2.2. Isolation of Diazotrophic Bacteria Associated with Rice Roots

Diazotrophic bacteria were isolated from roots according to the method proposed by Baldani et al. [39]. Roots were washed with copious amounts of water to remove soil remnants and immersed successively in 70% ethanol solution for 3 min, sodium hypochlorite solution (2.5%) for 5 min, 70% ethanol solution for 30 s, and rinsed five times with sterile distilled water [39]. To confirm the success of the disinfection process, 100 µL of sterile distilled water from the last rinse of each sample was streaked on the surface of plates containing Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA) and incubated at 28 °C for 3 days [35]. Only samples with no growth were considered suitable for further analysis. Root tissues were macerated with sterile physiological saline solution (0.85%), and 100 µL of them were inoculated into JMV nitrogen-free semi-solid medium [40, 41] containing (g L-1) mannitol (5.0), K2HPO4 (0.6), KH2PO4 (1.8), MgSO4 7H2O (0.2), NaCl (0.1), CaCl2.2H2O (0.2), bromothymol blue (5 g L-1 in 0.2 N KOH) (2 mL), FeEDTA (16.4 g L-1) (4 mL), micronutrient solution (2 mL), and vitamin solution (1 mL). Distilled water was added to make up 1000 mL; pH was adjusted to 5.2 ± 0.2 with KOH, and agar was added at a rate of 1.8 g L-1. The appearance of a pellicle under the culture medium after 4 days of incubation indicated the presence of diazotrophic bacteria. This bacterial film was streaked in Petri dishes containing nitrogen-free solid JMV medium (agar, 15 g L-1) and incubated at 30°C for 5 days until colonies appeared. Isolates with different morphocolonial characteristics in each sample were purified by the streaking technique in Petri dishes containing TSA until pure cultures were obtained. The preservation of the collection was carried out by cryopreservation at -20°C and -80°C, as suggested by García and Cotter [42] and Cui et al. [43].

2.3. Genomic DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from bacterial cultures incubated overnight in Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB) (25 mL) at 28°C, shaken at 150 rpm, and the cell pellet was harvested by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 3 min [10]. The commercial GenEluteTM Bacterial Genomic DNA kit (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA concentration was measured in a NanoDrop one spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA), and the quality was verified in a 1% agarose gel, using DiamondTM Nucleic Acid Dye (Promega, USA) and visualised in a black light electrophoresis chamber (Cleaver Scientific Ltd., UK). The original DNA was stored at -20°C and -80°C.

2.4. Molecular Discrimination of Burkholderia

Strains belonging to the genus Burkholderia were selected using specific primers recA (Spilker et al. 2009). The primers recA-F (forward) 5’-AGGACGATTCATGGAAGAWAGC-3’ and recA-R (reverse) 5’-GACGCACYGAYGMRTAGAACTT-3’ amplified a specific sequence of approximately 704 bp of the recA gene. The polymerase chain reaction was performed in a Biometra thermal cycler (Analytic Jena, Germany). PCR reactions were performed using a 25 µL reaction mix containing 1.0 µL template DNA (50 ng), 12.5 µL KAPA Taq ReadyMixTM (2x) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) (DNA polymerase, 0.05 units µL-1, 3 mM MgCl2, 400 µM each dNTP), 1.0 µL of each primer (5 pmol each forward and reverse), and 9.5 µL of PCR grade water (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The PCR cycle was as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 minutes, 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing at 58°C for 30 seconds, an extension for 60 seconds at 72°C, and a final extension at 72 °C of 5 min. Two µL of each PCR product was visualized on a 1.0% agarose gel in 0.5X TAE buffer, according to Mahenthiralingam et al. [44]. Positive amplification of the fragment allowed the discrimination of strains of the genus Burkholderia. The PCR products were purified and sequenced by MACROGEN Inc. (South Korea).

2.5. BOX-PCR Genomic Profiles

Genomic profiles were obtained by amplifying genomic DNA using the BOX-A1R primer (5'-CTACGGCAAGGCGACGCTGACG-3') [45] in a Biometra Tone thermal cycler (Analytic Jena), following the cycle program described by Arone. et al. [46]. PCR products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel running at 60 V for 8 hours and then visualised in a black light electrophoresis chamber (Cleaver Scientific Ltd., UK). The DirectLoadTM 1 kb DNA Ladder (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was used as a molecular weight marker. The genomic profiles of the individual strains generated were photographed, digitised, and converted into a binary matrix of the presence or absence of DNA bands. Cluster analysis allowed the construction of dendrograms using the free program DendroUPGMA (genomes.urv.es/UPGMA/) [47], applying the UPGMA algorithm (Unweighted Pair-Group Method with Arithmetic Mean) [48], and the Jaccard t coefficient [49], with 2% tolerance.

2.6. recA Gene Phylogeny

The recA sequences obtained were compared with those from GenBank using the BLASTN algorithm [50]. Sequences of all types of strains of the genus Burkholderia sensu stricto were obtained from the NCBI database and aligned using ClustalW [51]. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using a maximum likelihood (ML) approach [52] using the MEGA X software [53]. Pairwise distances were calculated using MEGA X [53] with the two-parameter Kimura model [54]. The topological robustness of the ML tree was inferred by non-parametric bootstrap analysis based on 100 pseudoreplicates.

2.7. Characterization of Growth Promotion Mechanisms

Standardised inocula of five B. vietnamiensis strains representing each different BOX-PCR group were cultured in TSB broth at 150 rpm and incubated overnight at 28°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 3 min [10] and washed at least twice with 0.85% sterile physiological saline. The cell suspension was standardised to an OD600 nm of 1.0 and used to evaluate growth promotion mechanisms.

2.7.1. Auxin Production

Auxin production was assayed by seeding 200 µL of standardised inoculum in 20 mL of TSB broth supplemented with L-tryptophan as precursor [38, 55] at increasing concentrations (0, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 600 µg mL-1). Treatments were incubated for 24 h at 26±2°C with shaking at 150 rpm. The supernatant of each treatment was obtained by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C. Salkowski's reagent (150 mL of H2SO4 mixed into 250 mL of distilled water and 7.5 mL of 0.5 M FeCl3.6H2O solution) was mixed with the supernatant in equal parts (1:1) and left in the dark for 30 minutes. The absorbance of the mixture was then measured at 535 nm in a spectrophotometer (PG Instruments Ltd, UK). The concentration of IAA was estimated from a standard curve.

2.7.2. Nitrogen Fixation

Asymbiotic nitrogen fixation capacity was tested according to Ríos-Ruiz et al. [56]. The nitrogen fixation capacity was tested in a mineral medium without nitrogen (MM-N [57] (g L-1) - mannitol, 10.0 g; sucrose, 10.0 g; K2HPO4, 0.6551 g; KH2PO4, 0.15 g; FeCl3, 0.0034 g; Na2MoO4. 2 H2O, 0.0108 g; NaCl, 0.02 g; CaCl2. 2 H2O, 0.01; MgSO4. 2H2O, 0.2 g; 1.6 g (semi-solid) or 16 g (solid) agar-agar, 0.5 mL bromothymol blue solution (0.5% in 70% ethanol), pH 7.0 ± 0.2). The standardised inocula were seeded on the surface of the semi-solid MM-N at a rate of 10% (150 µL per tube). The formation of a sub-pellicle under the semi-solid MM-N culture medium and the appearance of colonies in the solid MM-N medium, as well as the turning of the bromothymol blue indicator, indicated nitrogen fixation activity.

2.7.3. Siderophores Production

The qualitative production of siderophores by B. vietnamiensis strains was detected on chrome azurol-S (CAS) agar [58]. CAS agar consisted of a mixture of a CAS staining solution (solutions 1 and 2) and a succinate medium (SM). For solution 1 (60 mL), 60.5 mg of CAS (Hi-media, India) was dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water (pH 7.0) and then mixed with 10 mL of 1 mM FeCl3 6 H2O (5.4 mg FeCl3.6 H2O) dissolved in 10 mM HCl (0.822 mL of 37% HCl and density of 1.19 in 100 mL of distilled water). Using a magnetic stirrer, solution 1 was slowly added to solution 2 (72.84 mg HDMTA (Merck, Germany) dissolved in 40 mL distilled water, pH 7.0). The resulting solution (100 mL) was autoclaved at 121°C for 20 minutes and cooled to 50°C. For the SM culture medium, 720 mL of SM broth was added to 27.45 g of PIPES (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and the pH was reduced to 3.0 and corrected to 6.8 using a 30% KOH solution. The final mixture was made up to 810 mL with SM broth and supplemented with 15.0 g of agar-agar, then autoclaved at 121°C for 20 minutes and cooled to 60°C. The CAS agar was completed by mixing 810 mL of SM culture medium and 90 mL of CAS staining solution and then distributing the CAS agar in Petri dishes. Each strain was separately inoculated (20 µL) onto Petri dishes containing CAS agar and incubated at 28 ± 2°C for 72 hours in triplicate. The plates were scored by the colour change from blue to orange, the diameter of the siderophore production halo was evaluated, and the efficiency of siderophore production was determined using the following formula:

E%= [(halo diameter - colony diameter)/colony diameter] x 100. Samples were analysed in triplicate.

2.7.4. Phosphate Solubilization

Phosphate solubilization was evaluated qualitatively according to the method of Ramírez-Bahena et al. [59] and quantitatively according to Marra et al. [60] and Song et al. [61], both performed in agar and National Botanical Research Institute's phosphate (NBRIP) broth, respectively. The NBRIP medium had the following composition: glucose 10 gL-1, Ca3(PO4)2 5 g, (NH4)2SO4 0.1 g, MgCl2.6H2O 5 g, MgSO4.7H2O 0.25 g, and KCl, 0.2 g [62]. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 prior to autoclaving. For qualitative assessment, the NBRIP broth was supplemented with 1.5% agar (Hi-media, India), autoclaved, and served in Petri dishes. For each strain, 20 µL of standardised inoculum was inoculated in quadruplicate into a Petri dish containing NBRIP agar. The inoculated plates were incubated at 28°C, and the solubilization diameter halo (the translucent area around the colony) was measured using an electronic vernier after 15 days of incubation. The solubilisation index (SI) = halo diameter (mm)/colony diameter (mm) was determined as proposed by Marra et al. [60]. For quantitative evaluation, 200 µL of standardised inoculum was inoculated in triplicate into 20 mL of NBRIP broth and incubated at 26 ± 2°C at 150 rpm for 24 h. At the end of this period, the inoculum was discarded. The supernatant was centrifuged (13,500 rpm for 5 minutes), the pH was measured, and the amount of soluble P was quantified using the phosphomolybdate method [63]. The blank treatment consisted of the NBRIP broth without inoculation and shaking. The strains with phosphate solubilising capacity were those with a soluble P concentration higher than the blank treatment.

2.7.5. Antibiosis and Antagonism against Phytopathogenic Fungi

The methods used to study the indirect mechanisms related to the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi in rice in five strains of B. vietnamiensis were antagonism and antibiosis, as proposed by Castellano-Hinojosa and Bedmar [64] and Ríos-Ruiz et al. [34]. Several phytopathogenic fungi, i. e. Rhizoctonia solani (RS1), Rhizoctonia oryzae (RO1), Rhizoctonia oryzae-sativae (ROS1), Nakataea sigmoidea (NS1), and Nigrospora oryzae (NO1), were donated by the Plant Disease Diagnostic Centre, Faculty of Agrarian Sciences-Universidad Nacional de Tumbes, and were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA).

For antagonism assays, fungi were first grown in PDA medium and used to take 1 cm diameter agar plugs, which were placed in the center of plates containing PDA medium that had previously been independently inoculated with 100 μL of each of the strains grown in TSB. The cells were incubated for 72 hours at 25 °C, and the diameter of the inhibition zones was recorded after 7 days. The percentage of inhibition was calculated using the formula: % inhibition = [(R1-R2/R1) x 100, where R1 is the diameter of the fungal mycelium in plates not inoculated with the bacterial culture and R2 is the diameter of the fungal mycelium in plates inoculated with the bacterial culture. For the antibiosis test, the agar plugs containing the fungus were placed in the center of a plate containing PDA medium, with the strains to be inoculated in the three equidistant quadrants of the plate at a rate of 20 µL for each strain. The inhibitory effect on fungal growth was evaluated after 7 days at 25 °C, and the percentage of inhibition relative to the control (without bacteria) was evaluated as indicated above. Both assays were performed in triplicate and incubated for 48 h at 25 °C.

2.8. Evaluation of Growth Promotion in two Rice Cultivars

For the standardization of inocula, the methodologies proposed by Granada et al. [65] for germination and vigour index assays and by Wallner et al. [66] for growth promotion assays were applied. B. vietnamiensis strains were cultured in 3 mL of TSB and incubated at 28°C for 24 h at 170 rpm. The fermented broth was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C to harvest the cells. The cell pellet was washed at least twice with sterile 10 mM MgSO4 solution at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The cell suspension was adjusted to an OD600 nm of 0.001 (approximately 2 x 106 CFU mL-1) for the germination and vigour index assays and to an OD600 nm of 1.0 (approximately 5 x 109 CFU mL-1) for the growth promotion assay. Finally, the cell count was verified by the drop method in Petri dishes containing TSA agar [67] in INIA-510, La Conquista (LC) and INIA 507, La Esperanza (LE), both from the National Rice Programme, El Porvenir-San Martín Experimental Station of the Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA). For the trials, seeds of both varieties were surface disinfected according to the methodology proposed by Ji et al. [38]. Seeds were immersed in a 5% NaOCl solution for 8 min, rinsed three times with sterile distilled water, immersed once in a 70% ethanol solution, and finally rinsed six times with sterile distilled water.

2.8.1. Germination Test and Vigor Index

To evaluate the germination percentage and the vigor index, a completely randomized experimental design was used, with a factorial arrangement of seven treatments for two rice varieties (LC and LE) and five replicates of ten seeds each. The inoculated treatments consisted of five strains of B. vietnamiensis (T1 to T5), a treatment inoculated with the control strain Priestia megaterium SMBH14-02 [56], and a blank treatment. Fifty disinfected seeds were placed in a sterile tube (50 mL) and inoculated by immersion with 25 mL of standardized inoculum per strain and 25 mL of 10 mM MgSO4 solution for the blank treatment. The treatments were incubated for two hours at room temperature under the same conditions. The inoculated seeds were sown on absorbent paper at the bottom of Magenta® boxes (200 mL) previously sterilized at 121°C for 30 minutes and moistened with 4 mL of sterile distilled water. The treatments were incubated in the dark at 25 ± 1°C for 10 days, and the following parameters were evaluated: shoot length (SL) (cm), root length (RL) (cm), germination percentage (%), and vigor index using the following formula:

Vigor index = (SL + RL) * germination (%)

2.8.2. Growth Promotion Evaluation

To evaluate growth promotion, a completely randomized experimental design was used, with a factorial arrangement of seven treatments for two rice varieties (LC and LE) and with ten replicates each. The inoculated treatments consisted of five strains of B. vietnamiensis (T1 to T5), a treatment inoculated with the control strain P. megaterium SMBH14-02 [56], and a blank treatment. The disinfected seeds were placed in Petri dishes (15 x 150 mm) containing 1% (w/v) sterile water agar and germinated at 25 ± 1°C for 3 days in the dark until 1 cm radicles were obtained. The germinated seeds were sown in previously disinfected polypropylene pots (9 x 9 cm, 250 mL) with 85 g of fertilized and sterilized greenhouse substrate (Klasmann TS 1®, Lithuania) irrigated with 55 mL of sterile water distilled to reach a capacity of 60% field. Inoculation was carried out at a rate of 1 mL of standardized inoculum per seed and 1 mL of 10 mM MgSO4 solution for the blank treatment. The treatments were watered at least twice a week with 50% Hoagland nutrient solution supplemented with 1% KNO3 to 60% field capacity through an irrigation tube installed in each pot. The seedlings were maintained under controlled conditions (80% humidity at 28°C, 16 h light: 8 h dark), and after 21 days, the following parameters were evaluated: root length (RL) (cm), shoot length (SL) (cm), total length (TL) (cm), shoot dry weight (SDW) (mg), root dry weight (RDW) (mg), total dry weight (TDW) (mg), percentage of nitrogen in the shoot (%NPA), percentage of nitrogen in the root (%NPR), and percentage of total nitrogen (%NT).

2.9. Statistical Analyses

The normality and homoscedasticity of the data were tested. Significant differences between strains and their effects on the growth promotion mechanisms in two rice varieties were studied using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the R command package in R studio desktop version 1.3.1093. The Tukey’s test was carried out with a significance level of 95% (P ≤ 0.05) when parametric data were available; otherwise, the Kruskal-Walli test was conducted with a significance level of 95% (P ≤ 0.05). Correlations between variables were estimated using Pearson's correlation. The difference in germination rate between the two cultivars was tested with a two-tailed t-test, and the difference in germination rate for each cultivar, whether inoculated with inocula or with MgSO4 solution, was tested with the empirical rule, where 99.7% of the values are within three standard deviations of the mean.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Isolation and Characterization of Strains

We collected 132 root samples from cultivated rice varieties in the four rice valleys of Bajo Mayo (30), Alto Mayo (57), Huallaga Central (15), and Alto Huallaga (30) (Table 1). We isolated 211 Gram-negative bacterial isolates from the surface-sterilized roots; however, only 78 strains (36% of the total) showed nitrogen-fixing ability in our tests. As we were focusing on B. vietnamiensis, a nitrogen-fixing species, only they were kept isolated for further analysis. Most (44, 57.90%) of these Gram-negative and diazotrophic isolates came from plants grown in the Huallaga Central Valley, while only 6 came from plants grown in the Alto Mayo Valley.

Table 1.
Geographical location of rice collections and distribution of diazotrophic Gram-negative strains isolated from surface-sterilized roots from rice varieties from rice valleys in the San Martin Region
Valley Province District/Sector Rice Cultivar Geographical Coordinates Amount of Samples Number and code of Diazotrophic Gram-negative Strains
Bajo Mayo Lamas Cacatachi/Rosanaico La Conquista 6° 28' 11” S, 76° 26' 26” W; 299 m.a.s.l. 30 (3)-B1; B3; B13
San Martín Juan Guerra/Estación El Porvenir La Conquista, Valor, La Esperanza, Fedearroz 60 6° 35' 49” S, 76° 19' 32” W; 309 m.a.s.l. (4)-B34; B37; B48; B49
Alto Mayo Rioja Awajun/San Francisco de Amayo Valor, La Esperanza, La Victoria 5° 46' 43” S, 77° 18' 29” W; 916 m.a.s.l. 36 (3)-B51; B52; B74
Moyobamba Moyobamba/La conquista Valor 5° 52' 41” S, 77° 10' 10” W; 913 m.a.s.l. 21 (3)-B61; B89; B90
Huallaga Central Bellavista Bellavista/El Porvenir Ferón 7° 03' 11” S, 76° 33' 54” W; 235 m.a.s.l. 15 (9)-B91; B92; B94; B102; B103; B104; B105; B106; B106a
Bellavista San Rafael/Carhuapoma La Esperanza 7° 00' 21” S, 76° 30' 08” W; 228 m.a.s.l. (9)-B126; B129; B130; B131; B135; B138; B139; B140; B142
Picota Picota/Santa Rocillo Valor 6° 55' 32” S, 76° 22' 23” W; 218 m.a.s.l. (21)-B107; B108; B109; B110; B111; B113; B114; B115; B118; B119; B121; B122; B124; B154; B155a; B158; B159; B160; B161; B162; B163
Picota San Hilarión/San Hilarión Ferón 6° 59' 55” S, 76° 27' 05” W; 225 m.a.s.l. (5)-B145; B146; B147; B151; B152
Alto Huallaga Tocache Uchiza/Nueva Esperanza El Valor 8° 15' 39” S, 76° 33' 59” W, 495 m.a.s.l. 15 (7)-B167; B168a; B168b; B169a; B169b; B171a; B172a
Uchiza/San Juan de Porongo El Valor, Ferón 8° 23' 27” S, 76° 17' 17” W, 625 m.a.s.l. (10)-B172b; B175; B176; B177; B178; B188; B189; B190; B191; B192
Tocache/San Miguel del Porvenir Ferón, Valor 8° 16' 26” S, 76° 32' 25” W; 590 m.a.s.l. 15 (4)-B193; B195; B196; B201

3.2. Molecular Discrimination of Burkholderia

Only 4 isolates (5.13%) from our collection of Gram-negative and nitrogen-fixing bacteria, together with two previously isolated strains of B. vietnamiensis la3c3 and la1a4 [34], amplified a fragment of 704 bp corresponding to the recA gene using primers specific to Burkholderia. Sequencing of the recA gene confirmed the taxonomic identity of the isolates in the species B. vietnamiensis. These 4 isolates all originated from the Alto Huallaga Valley and, more specifically, from the Nueva Esperanza sector of the Uchiza district. The la3c3 and la1a4 strains were originally sampled from the Central Huallaga Valley [34].

3.3. BOX-PCR Genomic Profiling

To study the intraspecific diversity of the six B. vietnamiensis strains, genomic DNA profiles were performed using BOX-PCR analysis. The fragments obtained ranged from 500 to 10,000 bp. Using a similarity level of 90% as a cut-off point, 5 different groups were obtained (Fig. 1). These groups were named from G1 (BOX group 1) to G5 (BOX group 5). Each group, except G1, contains only one isolate. The strains la3c3 and la1a4 fall into two different BOX-PCR groups. Based on the BOX-PCR dendrogram, one strain per group was selected for amplification, sequencing, and phylogenetic study of the recA gene.

3.4. Phylogeny of the recA Gene

Sequencing resulted in partial recA sequences of 625-667 bp. Based on blast and phylogenetic analyses, it was confirmed that the 5 isolates representing the BOX-PCR groups belonged to the species B. vietnamiensis, with percentages of similarity of the recA gene between 98.36 and 99.51% with the type strain of B. vietnamiensis LMG 10929T. The maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree, including sequences of the type strain of the genus Burkholderia sensu stricto, is shown in Fig. (2). All B. vietnamiensis sequences were clustered in the same highly supported (99%BP) clade. The recA gene sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: OQ706314-OQ706318.

3.5. Growth Promotion Mechanisms Detected in Burkholderia vietnamiensis

All the strains studied were able to express the direct mechanisms of growth promotion, auxin, and siderophore production, phosphate solubilisation, and diazotrophic capacity (Table 2), as well as the capacity for antibiosis and antagonism against phytopathogenic rice fungi as indirect growth promotion mechanisms (Table 3). All strains were able to produce auxin in the basal TSB medium (0 µg mL-1) and the TSB media supplemented with tryptophan (100 ppm to 600 ppm). There was also a strong positive correlation between auxin production and tryptophan supplementation in TSB broth (r2= 0.99). Under all conditions, B. vietnamiensis strain B169b produced a significantly higher amount of auxin compared to the other strains.

Fig. (1).

Fingerprinting dendrogram of similarity based on the BOX-PCR profiles of the isolates of this study using the UPGMA algorithm and the Jaccard coefficient with 2% tolerance using the online dendrogram construction utility DendroUPGMA (http://genomes.urv.es/UPGMA/) [47].

All strains were efficient in the production of siderophores, forming orange halos around the bacterial colonies of smaller or larger diameter depending on the strain (Fig. 3), highlighting B. vietnamiensis strain B169b as significantly the most efficient strain (139.52%). Regarding phosphate solubilization, all strains were able to solubilize tricalcium phosphate from NBRIP agar, as evidenced by the appearance of a transparent halo around the bacterial colonies.

This activity was reflected in the solubilization indices and the solubilization efficiency obtained, although no statistically significant differences were observed between them. The strains also showed no statistically significant differences in the concentration of phosphate released into the culture medium. A negative correlation was observed between the final pH of the culture medium and the difference in soluble phosphate in the culture medium with the white treatment (r2= -0.92). Finally, all strains were able to form a sub film in the semi-solid JMV medium and to grow on the JMV agar, both nitrogen-free, indirectly demonstrating their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen.

3.6. Antagonism and Antibiosis Capacity of B. vietnamiensis Strains

In terms of antibiosis capacity, all strains inhibited the growth of the five phytopathogenic fungi, but strain la3c3 showed the greatest antibiosis activity, inhibiting 100% of the growth of R. solani, R. oryzae, N. oryzae and N. sigmoidea. All five strains were able to inhibit 100% of the growth of N. oryzae, the most susceptible phytopathogenic fungus, while the least susceptible was Rhizoctonia oryzae-sativae, with radial growth inhibition ranging from 76.47% (la1a4) to 86.04% (B171a) (Table 3 and Fig. 4).

All strains inhibited the growth of the five phytopathogenic fungi, with strain B169b showing the highest range of antagonistic capacity against the five phytopathogenic fungi. The most susceptible fungus was N. sigmoidea, with a range of 59.94% (la3c3) to 77.56% (B169b) antagonism, and the least susceptible was N. oryzae, with a range of 41.98% (B168a) to 49.21% (la1a4) growth inhibition (Table 3 and Fig. 3).

All B. vietnamiensis strains increased length, germination, and vigor index in both rice cultivars under gnotobiotic conditions, although there was no clear significant difference among isolates. While there were substantial differences between the strains in terms of root length in the LE cultivar, we found none for LC. The same result was observed for the length of aerial parts. The highest growth promotion effects compared to the uninoculated reached 50% and 35.6% for root length (LE/B169b and LC/lac3c, respectively) and 32.2% and 33.4% for shoot length (LE/B168a and LC/B168a, respectively).

Fig. (2).

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on recA gene sequences (650 positions) showing the relationships among phytobeneficial Burkholderia isolated in this study and closely related species of the genus Burkholderia sensu stricto. The significance of each branch is indicated by a bootstrap value (as a percentage) calculated for 1000 subsets (only values greater than 50% are indicated). Bar, 5 substitutions per 100 nucleotide positions. The recA sequence of Bradyrhizobium vignae 7-2T was used as an outgroup.

Table 2.
Direct growth promotion mechanisms evaluated in five endophytic Burkholderia vietnamiensis strains isolated from rice roots.
Strains Auxins Production (µg mL-1) Siderophores Production Phosphate Solubilization Free-living Nitrogen Fixation
0 ppm 100 ppm 200 ppm 400 ppm 600 ppm EPS (%) Qualitative Quantitative
Solubilization Index Solubilization Efficiency pH Solubilized P (mg PO4 mL-1)
la1a4 8.10 (±0.15) B 8.86 (±0.21) B 8.72 (±0.16) B 11.79 (±0.35) A 10.97 (±0.20) B 93.38 (±1.85) B 2.63 (±0.04) A 162.73 (±3.54) A 3.89 11.62 (±0.22) A +
la3c3 0.25 (±0.25) D 0.70 (±0.03) D 0.15 (±0.08) D 1.27 (±0.10) C 2.76 (±0.05) D 52.32 (±1.18) D 2.64 (±0.03) A 163.88 (±3.46) A 3.93 12.18 (±0.77) A +
B169b 9.08 (±0.07) A 9.70 (±0.17) A 13.98 (±0.31) A 11.76 (±0.07) A 13.90 (±0.22) A 139.52 (±3.30) A 2.58 (±0.04) A 157.80 (±4.33) A 3.81 15.99 (±0.58) A +
B168a 0.10 (±0.05) D 1.89 (±0.09) C 1.41 (±0.05) C 3.79 (±0.10) B 4.60 (±0.44) C 72.3 (±11.91) C 2.59 (±0.04) A 159.31 (±3.66) A 3.84 15.26 (±0.28) A +
B171a 2.82 (±0.05) C 1.41 (±0.05) C 0.62 (±0.03) D 3.30 (±0.07) B 3.33 (±0.38) B 47.72 (±1.87) DE 2.53 (±0.01) A 153.25 (±0.69) A 3.69 17.63 (±0.48) A +
C.V (%) 5.94 5.01 5.68 4.76 7.09 10.03 2.65 4.24 -- 19.30 --
Values followed by different letters indicate significant differences. Tukey test, p = 0.05.
Table 3.
Antibiosis and antagonism of five strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis on five species of rice phytopathogenic fungi.
Strains Rhizoctonia solani (RS1) Rhizoctonia oryzae (RO1) Rhizoctonia oryzae-sativae (ROS1) Nigrospora oryzae (NO1) Nakataea sigmoidea (NS1)
ANTIBIOTIC (%)
B168a 78.59 (±0.12) C 100.00 (±0.00) A 82.23 (±1.94) AB 100.00 (±0.00) A 100.00 (±0.00) A
B171a 100.00 (±0.00) A 100.00 (±0.00) A 86.04 (±0.35) A 100.00 (±0.00) A 90.86 (±0.24) B
B169b 100.00 (±0.00) A 77.93 (±2.04) B 79.72 (±1.53) BC 100.00 (±0.00) A 87.80 (±0.50) C
la3c3 100.00 (±0.00) A 100.00 (±0.00) A 84.82 (±0.69) A 100.00 (±0.00) A 100.00 (±0.00) A
la1a4 80.39 (±0.61) B 75.80 (±3.49) B 76.47 (±0.80) C 100.00 (±0.00) A 100.00 (±0.00) A
C.V(%) 0.39 3.45 2.56 0 0.45
ANTAGONISM (%)
B168a 56.22 (±2.60) A 59.03 (±2.36) A 73.85 (±5.87) A 41.98 (±1.92) A 73.63 (±1.46) A
B171a 61.20 (±2.64) A 57.54 (±1.47) A 54.39 (±5.27) B 44.96 (±1.20) A 72.79 (±2.00) A
B169b 58.71 (±1.00) A 55.06 (±2.27) A 65.87 (±2.89) AB 47.50 (±3.07) A 77.56 (±1.45) A
la3c3 64.68 (±2.13) A 61.51 (±0.99) A 64.87 (±2.00) AB 44.72 (±1.61) A 59.94 (±0.92) B
la1a4 56.22 (±1.42) A 57.54 (±0.99) A 61.87 (±2.40) AB 49.21 (±3.17) A 63.75 (±2.73) B
C.V(%) 8.52 7.26 15.3 12.5 6.4
Values followed by different letters indicate significant differences. Tukey test, p = 0.05.
Fig (3).

Production of siderophores by Burkholderia vietnamiensis strains on CAS agar

Fig. (4).

Evaluation of antagonism (A) and antibiosis (B) in five strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis against five strains of phytopathogenic rice fungi, RS1 (Rhizoctonia solani), ROS1 (Rhizoctonia oryzae-sativae), RO1 (Rhizoctonia oryzae), NS1 (Nakataea sigmoidea) and NO1 (Nigrospora oryzae).

All inoculation conditions resulted in a significant increase in the total length or vigor index of the plant, irrespective of the cultivar, but with no significant difference between the cultivars (Table 4). While the germination rate differed between the two varieties (p<0.04), the effects of inoculation on this rate were highly significant compared to the uninoculated conditions (p<0.003), with a higher germination rate for inoculated seeds.

Finally, in the 21-day test, there was no significant difference between the strains of B. vietnamiensis with P. megaterium SMBH14-02 for length, dry weight, and nitrogen accumulation. Similarly, non-significant differences were observed in the accumulation of TDW inoculated with B. vietnamiensis strains in the LC cultivar. Differences were observed in the accumulation of total nitrogen, which was higher in the LE cultivar inoculated with B. vietnamiensis la3c3 (6.96%) and with B. vietnamiensis B171a (7.17%) in the LC cultivar (Table 5).

Table 4.
Evaluation of the vigor index of two rice varieties inoculated with five strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis grown under gnotobiotic conditions.
Strains RL SL TL Germination Vigor Index
LE1 LC1 LE1 LC1 LE1 LC1 LE LC LE1 LC1
la1a4 58.63 (±1.42) DE 60.41 (±0.92) A 38.16 (±1.42) C 45.36 (±1.09) A 94.40 (±2.57) B 105.77 (±1.71) A 98 98 8582.06 (±199.35) Bb 10365.66 (±194.20) Aa
la3c3 68.13 (±1.02) C 60.52 (±2.19) A 44.97 (±0.94) AB 44.73 (±2.25) A 112.71 (±2.02) A 105.25 (±3.54) A 100 94 11310.27 (±193.25) Aa 9892.84 (±414.10) Ab
B169b 75.27 (±1.97) A 58.74 (±1.88) A 44.22 (±1.23) B 44.20 (±1.46) A 115.18 (±2.79) A 102.94 (±3.18) A 96 94 11470.50 (±305.63) Aa 9675.80 (±308.90) Ab
B168a 65.22 (±1.62) CD 58.79 (±1.52) A 49.75 (±1.33) A 45.62 (±2.20) A 111.12 (±2.01) A 104.41 (±4.09) A 100 96 11496.67 (±294.38) Aa 10023.49 (±355.84) Ab
B171a 72.8 ((±1.80) B 57.89 (±1.43) A 43.47 (±0.96) B 42.65 (±1.40) A 112.08 (±2.26) A 100.54 (±2.49) A 100 94 11626.93 (±272.51) Aa 9450.57 (±264.82) Ab
Priestia megaterium SMBH14-02 67.81 (±0.82) CD 60.68 (±1.31) A 42.28 (±0.91) BC 40.36 (±1.10) AB 108.21 (±1.60) A 101.04 (±2.16) A 100 100 11008.73 (±172.29) Aa 10103.97 (±236.04) Ab
Non-inoculated control 49.97 (±1.11) E 44.63 (±1.19) B 37.61 (±0.70) DE 34.19 (±1.22) B 88.32 (±1.59) B 78.82 (±2.01) B 92 84 8235.35 (±176.77) Ba 6620.43 (±201.69) Bb
CV (%) 12.13 14.73 14.83 20.63 11.17 15.76 12.31 16.94
Values followed by different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between strains, and values followed by different lowercase superscript letters indicate significant differences between cultivars.
RL: Root length; SL: Shoot length; TL: Total length of the plant; LE: INIA 507 “La Esperanza” rice cultivar; LC: INIA 510 “La Conquista” rice cultivar
1Kruskal Wallis test, p = 0.05.
Table 5.
Evaluation of growth promotion of two rice varieties inoculated with five strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis grown for 21 days under gnotobiotic conditions.
Parameter Burkholderia vietnamiensis Priestia Megaterium SMBH14-02 Non-inoculated Control CV (%)
la1a4 la3c3 B169b B168a B171a
RL-LE2 mm. 103.89 (±3.22) B 103.90 (±5.02) B 115.78 (±5.15) B 142.04 (±1.90) A 116.04 (±2.98) B 106.10 (±7.64) B 97.51 (±2.98) B 13.28
RL-LC2 73.94 (±4.94) AB 77.36 (±4.83) AB 79.68 (±3.04) A 82.93 (±3.00) A 88.55 (±2.14) A 81.77 (±1.64) A 63.86 (±3.10) B 13.90
SL-LE2 167.64 (±2.59) B 192.27 (±3.76) A 175.77 (±4.91) AB 121.85 (±2.72) C 169.79 (±4.50) B 172.00 (±7.61) B 159.81 (±2.68) B 8.47
SL-LC1 196.73 (±5.44) AB 201.12 (±7.77) AB 195.07 (±3.84) AB 211.53 (±4.89) A 199.70 (±3.27) AB 205.49 (±5.23) AB 180.50 (±9.57) B 9.67
TL-LE1 268.29 (±3.42) ABCa 285.26 (±5.30) Aba 288.06 (±8.96) Aa 258.98 (±4.28) BCb 281.65 (±5.50) Aa 263.82 (±8.74) ABCb 251.13 (±4.81) Ca 7.22
TL-LC2 275.69 (±8.02) Aa 281.12 (±10.43) Aa 265.25 (±5.17) Ab 289.96 (±8.96) Aa 284.90 (±4.73) Aa 290.04 (±4.63) Aa 232.43 (±13.65) Ba 9.41
RDW-LE2 mg 11.27 (±0.18) A 11.35 (±0.29) A 11.28 (±0.40) AB 11.25 (±6.05) A 11.57 (±0.20) A 9.81 (±0.27) B 9.31 (±0.18) B 7.84
RDW-LC1 10.58 (±0.32) A 9.98 (±0.30) ABC 10.01 (±0.27) ABC 10.56 (±0.19) AB 11.21 (±0.26) A 9.69 (±0.47) BC 8.77 (±0.20) C 9.36
SDW-LE2 16.85 (±0.61) AB 17.55 (±0.34) AB 17.69 (±0.60) AB 16.47 (±0.81) B 19.20 (±0.64) A 13.37 (±0.48) C 13.39 (±0.35) C 11.01
SDW-LC1 14.79 (±0.54) AB 13.95 (±0.91) ABC 14.36 (±0.41) ABC 13.78 (±0.34) ABC 16.47 (±0.75) A 12.60 (±0.49) BC 11.68 (±0.86) C 14.76
TDW-LE2 27.85 (±0.68) Aa 28.61 (±0.50) Aa 28.78 (±1.04) Aa 27.47 (±0.90) Aa 30.49 (±2.54) Aa 22.47 (±0.75) Ba 23.05 (±0.49) Ba 8.91
TDW-LC1 24.62 (±0.43) ABb 22.16 (±0.61) BCb 23.44 (±0.43) ABa 24.72 (±0.72) ABb 26.20 (±1.01) Ab 22.73 (±0.62) BCa 20.44 (±0.59) Cb 8.84
% NPA-LE % 4.91 5.67 4.21 4.64 4.76 4.56 4.29 ---
%NPA-LC 4.63 4.87 5.03 4.06 6.24 4.39 4.18 ---
% NPR-LE 1.80 1.29 1.39 1.31 1.76 1.34 1.05 ---
% NPR-LC 1.54 1.31 1.44 1.78 0.93 1.25 1.54 ---
%NT-LE 6.70 6.96 5.60 5.95 6.52 5.90 5.34 ---
%NT-LC 6.17 6.19 6.46 5.83 7.17 5.64 5.71 ---
Values followed by different capital letters indicate significant differences, and values followed by different lowercase superscript letters indicate significant differences between cultivars. Abbreviations: RL: Root length; SL: Shoot length; TL: Total length of the plant; RDW: Root Dry Weight; SDW: Shoot Dry Weight; TDW: Total Dry Weight; %NPA: Percentage of Nitrogen in the Shoot ; %NPR: Percentage of nitrogen in root; %NT: Percentage of total nitrogen. LE: INIA 507 “La Esperanza” rice cultivar ; LC: INIA 510 Cultivate « La Conquista» 1Tukey test, p = 0.05; 2Kruskal Wallis test, p = 0.05.

4. DISCUSSION

Root-associated bacteria are an important part of the phytomicrobiome, not only because they represent a selected fraction of the soil microbiota but also because of the growth-promoting mechanisms they express in close association with plants, especially in the Poaceae family. There are several reports of bacteria being selected for their diazotrophic capacity in rice cultivation [36, 38, 68-71].

De Oliveira et al. [68], in a bioprospecting study on diazotrophic bacteria in the rice cultivar BRS tropical, reported that 18% of the isolates obtained were similar to those in the genus Burkholderia, and diverse species of Burkholderia have been repeatedly isolated from healthy rice roots [66]. In our study, the proportion of Burkholderia was much lower (5.26%) and was isolated only from the rice variety “El valor”, grown in the Alto Huallaga valley. It is worth mentioning that the primers used for the detection of Burkholderia missed some isolates and did not amplify them. However, when searching the complete or draft genomes of B. vietnamiensis available in NCBI, we did not find any example of genomes (among the 208 genomes available) where the primers would not have amplified the recA fragment.

This explanation, therefore, seems unlikely. The low frequency of Burkholderia isolates in our study could also be due to the selection of isolates for which we attempted to amplify a recA fragment. We focused on isolates that could fix nitrogen because all previous studies and available genomes have shown that B. vietnamiensis strains are free-living nitrogen fixers. This choice may have excluded some other Burkholderia species that are not free-living nitrogen fixers, thus reducing the number of Burkholderia isolates. However, several have been shown to act as plant-associated nitrogen fixers [72]. Finally, the low frequency of B. vietnamiensis isolates in our sampling may simply reflect their low frequency in soil. However, this species has been shown to be frequently recovered from rice roots in different geographical locations. Moreover, Burkholderia s. l. is a highly conserved microbial group of the microbiota in rice, regardless of soil type and cultivar [73].

Quite surprisingly, the box PCR profiles showed diversity among the different isolates and the four recovered in this study. It is expected that a very small number of isolates recovered from a single site would end up as a single identical clone, which is not the case since we detected at least three different profiles (together with the two other strains isolated in a previous study, but from a different site in Peru). The recA gene, as a reliable phylogenetic marker for assigning taxonomic identity within the genus Burkholderia [10, 74-78], confirmed that the 4 strains isolated belonged to the species B. vietnamiensis but showed less diversity than the Box-PCR approach (as expected). In fact, the 3 representative isolates of the 3 groups showed the same recA sequences, while the other 2 showed 2 nucleotide differences with our isolates. The Box-PCR diversity, with 3 different profiles among the 4 isolates obtained, however, suggests that we may indeed have missed some B. vietnamiensis diversity in our sampling and that we should possibly intensify our efforts to recover more isolates.

Based on these results and the genetic differences detected between the isolates, we expected some discrepancies in their growth-promoting abilities.

While several studies have previously demonstrated the beneficial effects of B. vietnamiensis on rice growth and possibly protection against pathogens, we investigated whether and how these strains might actually play a role as growth promoters. Among bacterial auxins, indoleacetic acid (IAA) is one of the most studied, influencing root architecture, nutrient uptake, and tolerance to abiotic factors. Bacterial IAA concentrations are influenced by intrinsic factors, such as strain type, presence of complete biosynthetic pathway genes, or extrinsic factors, such as precursor concentration, pH, and carbon source, among others [79]. It has been reported that IAA production is common in plant-associated strains of B. vietnamiensis [24, 30, 33, 34, 68, 80, 81]. Our results showed that there is a wide range of variation in auxin production among our isolates. At 600 ppm L-tryptophan, strain B169b produced 5 times more auxin than strain la3c3 (13.90 vs 2.76 µg mL-1). Most of the auxin found in the rhizosphere is believed to come from biosynthesis by microorganisms [82]. Variations in auxin production between strains present in the rhizosphere can, therefore, have a major impact on plant development, and from the point of view of artificial inoculation, our results proved that there is a basis for bacterial selection of the most productive strains.

B. vietnamiensis is also characterized by the production of siderophores [25, 81, 83, 84]. Among the functions performed by siderophores, biocontrol stands out due to their high affinity for Fe3+, which limits their access to phytopathogens and promotes plant growth under iron-limiting conditions [19]. As for auxin production, we also found large differences in the production of siderophores among the isolates, ranging from 47.72% (B171a) to 139.52% (B169b), leaving for auxin the possibility of strain selection for their ability to produce the highest amount of siderophore that can play a major role in agriculture [85].

Regarding the other two activities, we did not detect significant differences in phosphate solubilization, although all strains showed qualitative and quantitative evidence of P solubilization. The ability of B. vietnamiensis to solubilize insoluble phosphates has been widely reported previously [33, 36, 37, 81, 86]. Estrada et al. [33] reported that B. vietnamiensis isolates from rice achieved solubilisation index values similar to those reported in this study (2.34-2.95). However, while Bashan et al. [87] suggested a low correlation between halo formation and the ability to solubilise phosphates released in the liquid medium, we observed in our study that all strains that formed a solubilization halo (qualitatively) also solubilized phosphate in liquid medium (quantitatively).

Finally, all isolates showed the ability to fix nitrogen as free-living bacteria, but we could not measure this activity precisely and, therefore, could not estimate significant differences between them.

Given these results, we expected not only an effect of inoculation on plant growth but also possibly differences between strains for plant phenotypic traits in response at least to auxin production level differences. The beneficial interaction between B. vietnamiensis and rice has been described previously [12, 24, 25, 31, 34, 88], but with sometimes conflicting results. King et al. [89] reported that Nipponbare rice (japonica) plants inoculated with B. vietnamiensis TVV75 (LMG10929T) had no significant effect on biomass production compared to the non-inoculated control at 7 and 14 days after inoculation under gnotobiotic conditions. In our study, we found significant differences between the strains and the non-inoculated control evaluated at 10 and 21 days after inoculation. The LE genotype showed significant differences for root and shoot length at 10 days between isolates but with a weak correlation between the two sets of measurements (r2=0.38), while the LC genotype showed almost no significant differences, but with a higher r2 value (0.75). The low correlation value for LE resulted in a lack of significant differences between the strains when considering the total length (shoot + aerial), except for isolate la1a4, which is not different from the uninoculated condition. However, it was one of the higher auxins and siderophore producers in our tests. Many previous studies demonstrated the effect of bacterial auxin on plant growth in terms of height, root length, dry weight shoot and dry weight root, plant nutrient content, chlorophyll content, leaf area, and yield [90], with an effect being concentration-dependent [91]. We did not detect any relation between the level of auxin production of each strain and their impact on either root or shoot length. There was either no significant difference among strains (for variety LC) or no correlation for variety LE. The other putative growth-promoting activities we measured in our isolates do not appear to have an effect on rice growth either. This lack of correlation may be due to the absence of a dose effect, which would be rather surprising given the different production levels. More likely, the growing conditions may not have allowed auxin-related effects to be fully expressed. In our study, we chose to place our plants in non-limiting growing conditions, i.e., with a rich growth medium, where Fe or phosphate is not limiting and, therefore, the capacity of the bacteria to recover these elements does not play a major role. The increase in plant height and biomass is associated with an increase in the expression of plant genes involved in iron storage, siderophore biosynthesis, and nutrient transport [92].

One exception is related to nitrogen. It has been reported that inoculation of rice with B. vietnamiensis increases the efficient use of mineral nitrogen [24, 34]. Consequently, the five treatments with B. vietnamiensis and the control strain P. megaterium SMBH14-02, inoculated in the two rice varieties and supplemented with mineral nitrogen (KNO3 1%), increased the nitrogen content in the aerial and root parts from 11 to 19% on average. Although nitrogen fixation is an intrinsic capacity of B. vietnamiensis [25, 29, 93], recent studies have concluded that it would not be the main growth-promoting mechanism in rice. Shinjo et al. [24] inoculated B. vietnamiensis RS1 into seedlings of rice cultivar Nipponbare (japonica) and concluded that the promotion of root growth occurred through hormonal regulation and increased nitrogen uptake through the overexpression of genes related to the uptake, transport, and assimilation of mineral nitrogen. This ability is intrinsic to root-associated Burkholderia, as it improves the acquisition and transport of nutrients in tissues at the transcriptional level [92].

Finally, with regard to plant genotype, it is well known that plant genotype influences the response to inoculation of specific bacterial strains [94-96]. Wallner et al. [12] inoculated B. vietnamiensis LMG10929 into two rice cultivars, Nipponbare (japonica) and IR64 (indica); although they observed similar colonization patterns between the two genotypes, they found that there was a strong influence of rice genotype, particularly in relation to the indica group more than the japonica group. The IR64 (indica) cultivar inoculated with B. vietnamiensis increased the expression of the nitrate transporter NRT1.1B, affecting its capacity for assimilation and uptake of nitrate from the nutrient solution. In our study, the results suggested, once again, as in other studies, that selecting bacterial strains for inoculation to improve plant growth can only be done by taking into account the diversity of cultivated varieties and also by integrating into breeding programs the ability of varieties to interact with micro-organisms.

4.1. Inoculation of B. vietnamiensis and Protection against Pathogens

Recently, Wang et al. [97] reported that the inoculation of B. vietnamiensis strain B23 in Citrus plants increased the expression of genes related to the use and uptake of nutrients from the rhizosphere and increased antagonistic activities against competing bacteria and fungi, as well as resistance to competitor-derived metabolites. Meng et al. [28] reported the isolation of B. vietnamiensis C12 as an antifungal bacteria of the medicinal plant Ficus tikoua and demonstrated the production of siderophores with bactericidal activity, ornibactin C-4 and C-8. Similarly, Wang et al. [98] demonstrated the ability of B. vietnamiensis YQ9 to produce hydroxamate type siderophores.

All B. vietnamiensis strains in our study showed antagonistic and antibacterial activity against three members of the Rhizoctonia complex, including Rhizoctonia solani, the causal agent of rice downy mildew [28, 34, 99-101]. The antifungal activity of B. vietnamiensis against Nakataea sigmoidea and Nigrospora oryzae, the etiological agents of stem rot [103] and panicle branch rot [102], respectively, is reported for the first time. Meng et al. [28] reported the antifungal activity of B. vietnamiensis C12 against several phytopathogenic fungi, reaching 94.78% inhibition against R. solani, a higher range than that reported in our study (56.22 to 64.68%). The authors concluded that this antifungal activity against R. solani is due to the production of several secondary metabolites, such as siderophores ornibactin C4 and C8, the antifungal peptides burkholdin 1097, 1213, 1215, and 1119, and the monoterpenoid phenol carvacrol. In this study, it was found that all B. vietnamiensis strains have a strong effect on reducing fungal growth on artificial media in Petri dishes. Such ability of Burkholderia isolates to directly suppress the growth of phytopathogenic fungi has been described previously [90]. Antifungal metabolites produced by Burkholderia that are effective against the Rhizoctonia complex include pyrrolnitrin, phenazines, 1-phenazine carboxylic acid, volatile indolic compounds [104], siderophores, such as ornibactin [105], some quinolone antibiotics, such as hydroxymethyl-alkylquinoline [106], and occidiofungins A-D [107]. Searches for these compounds in B. vietnamiensis genomes have detected some of the genes involved in the production of these compounds (such as ornibactin), while others were not detected (such as pyrrolnitrin or occidiofungins A-D).

CONCLUSION

Burkholderia vietnamiensis, associated with rice grown in the Peruvian highland forest, presents a great genetic diversity and expresses different mechanisms of direct and indirect plant growth promotion. It exhibits great potential in the production of auxins, siderophores, phosphate solubilization, and the promotion of vigor index in rice. There is still a long way to isolate and characterize the antifungal compounds produced by B. vietnamiensis, but we can expect new metabolites to be found. It is also clear that there is a huge gap between Petri dish tests and the use of either live bacteria or metabolite extract in the field to combat rice diseases. However, even if Burkholderia s.s. is still a problematic genus for use as a bioinoculant, and B. vietnamiensis species in particular, it remains an extremely interesting and promising genus in the search for solutions and alternative compounds to fight against rice diseases

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

It is hereby acknowledged that all authors have accepted responsibility for the manuscript's content and consented to its submission. They have meticulously reviewed all results and unanimously approved the final version of the manuscript.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

s. l = sensu lato
s. s = sensu stricto
OD = Optic density
LE = La Esperanza
LC = La Conquista
TDW = Total Dry Weight
PCR = Polymerase Chain Reaction
IAA = Indole Acetic Acid

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

Not applicable.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

All data and information supporting the research are provided within the article. In particular the sequence data for the recA gene (OQ706314 OQ706318) are available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.

FUNDING

The study was funded by the Fondo National de Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación Tecnológica (FONDECyT) (grant number CONTRATO N° 062-2021-FONDECyT).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the rice specialist Edson Torres Chavez for donating seeds of the La Esperanza and La Conquista varieties for the promotion of inoculation tests. They would also like to thank Dr. Miguel Ángel Garrido Rondoy, Head of the Plant Disease Diagnostic Center, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Tumbes, who donated the strains of phytopathogenic fungi used in the antagonism and antibiosis tests. We thank the National University of Barranca for the funding provided for the publication of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

1
Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Oyaizu H, et al. Proposal of Burkholderia gen. nov. and transfer of seven species of the genus Pseudomonas homology group II to the new genus, with the type species Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni and Holmes 1981) comb. nov. Microbiol Immunol 1992; 36(12): 1251-75.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/mandi1977/36/12/36_12_1251/_pdf
2
Dobritsa AP, Samadpour M. Transfer of eleven species of the genus Burkholderia to the genus Paraburkholderia and proposal of Caballeronia gen. nov. to accommodate twelve species of the genera Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66(8): 2836-46.
3
Sawana A, Adeolu M, Gupta RS. Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus Burkholderia: proposal for division of this genus into the emended genus Burkholderia containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus Paraburkholderia gen. nov. harboring environmental species. Front Genet 2014; 5: 429.
4
Lopes-Santos L, Castro DBA, Ferreira-Tonin M, et al. Reassessment of the taxonomic position of Burkholderia andropogonis and description of Robbsia andropogonis gen. nov., comb. nov. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110(6): 727-36.
5
Estrada-de los Santos P, Palmer M, Chávez-Ramírez B, et al. Whole genome analyses suggests that Burkholderia sensu lato contains two additional novel genera (Mycetohabitans gen. nov., and Trinickia gen. nov.): implications for the evolution of diazotrophy and nodulation in the Burkholderiaceae. Genes (Basel) 2018; 9(8): 389.
6
Lin Q, Lv Y, Gao Z, Qiu L. Pararobbsia silviterrae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil and reclassification of Burkholderia alpina as Pararobbsia alpina comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70(2): 1412-20.
7
Jin Y, Zhou J, Zhou J, et al. Genome-based classification of Burkholderia cepacia complex provides new insight into its taxonomic status. Biol Direct 2020; 15(1): 6.
8
Adaikpoh BI, Fernandez HN, Eustáquio AS. Biotechnology approaches for natural product discovery, engineering, and production based on Burkholderia bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2022; 77: 102782.
9
Mullins AJ, Murray JAH, Bull MJ, et al. Genome mining identifies cepacin as a plant-protective metabolite of the biopesticidal bacterium Burkholderia ambifaria. Nat Microbiol 2019; 4(6): 996-1005.
10
Bach E, Sant’Anna FH, Magrich dos Passos JF, et al. Detection of misidentifications of species from the Burkholderia cepacia complex and description of a new member, the soil bacterium Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov. Pathog Dis 2017; 75(6): ftx076.
11
Morales-Ruíz LM, Rodríguez-Cisneros M, Kerber-Díaz JC, Rojas-Rojas FU, Ibarra JA, Estrada-de los Santos P. Burkholderia orbicola sp. nov., a novel species within the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Arch Microbiol 2022; 204(3): 178.
12
Wallner A, Busset N, Lachat J, et al. Differential Genetic Strategies of Burkholderia vietnamiensis and Paraburkholderia kururiensis for Root Colonization of Oryza sativa subsp. japonica and O. sativa subsp. indica, as Revealed by Transposon Mutagenesis Sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 2022; 88(14): e00642-22.
13
Depoorter E, Bull MJ, Peeters C, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Mahenthiralingam E. Burkholderia: an update on taxonomy and biotechnological potential as antibiotic producers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2016; 100(12): 5215-29.
14
Elshafie HS, Camele I. An overview of metabolic activity, beneficial and pathogenic aspects of Burkholderia spp. Metabolites 2021; 11(5): 321.
15
Eberl L, Vandamme P. Members of the genus Burkholderia: good and bad guys. F1000Research 2016.
16
Rojas-Rojas FU, López-Sánchez D, Meza-Radilla G, Méndez-Canarios A, Ibarra JA, Estrada-de los Santos P. El controvertido complejo Burkholderia cepacia, un grupo de especies promotoras del crecimiento vegetal y patógenas de plantas, animales y humanos. Rev Argent Microbiol 2019; 51(1): 84-92.
17
Alam K, Zhao Y, Lu X, et al. Isolation, complete genome sequencing and in silico genome mining of Burkholderia for secondary metabolites. BMC Microbiol 2022; 22(1): 323.
18
Fu H, Gan L, Tian Z, et al. Rapid detection of Burkholderia cepacia complex carrying the 16S rRNA gene in clinical specimens by recombinase-aided amplification. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12: 984140.
19
Afzal I, Shinwari ZK, Sikandar S, Shahzad S. Plant beneficial endophytic bacteria: Mechanisms, diversity, host range and genetic determinants. Microbiol Res 2019; 221: 36-49.
20
Aba-Regis BLL, Oliveros KMP, Ibarra-Romero C, et al. Draft Genome Sequence of the Phosphate-Solubilizing Rhizobacterium Burkholderia pseudomultivorans Strain MPSB1, Isolated from a Copper Mined-Out Site. Microbiol Resour Announc 2021; 10(1): e01304-20.
21
Draghi WO, Alvarez F, Russo DM, Lagares A, Wall LG, Zorreguieta A. Root-associated Burkholderia spp. on the hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) cover crop vary depending on soil history of use. Rhizosphere 2021; 17: 100297.
22
Fu Y, Yin ZH, Yin CY. Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rb1 to ginsenoside Rg3 by endophytic bacterium Burkholderia sp. GE 17-7 isolated from Panax ginseng. J Appl Microbiol 2017; 122(6): 1579-85.
23
Kong P, Richardson P, Hong C. Burkholderia sp. SSG is a broad-spectrum antagonist against plant diseases caused by diverse pathogens. Biol Control 2020; 151: 104380.
24
Shinjo R, Tanaka A, Sugiura D, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms underlying enhanced growth and root N acquisition in rice by the endophytic diazotroph, Burkholderia vietnamiensis RS1. Plant Soil 2020; 450(1-2): 537-55.
25
Gillis M, Van Van T, Bardin R, et al. Polyphasic taxonomy in the genus Burkholderia leading to an emended description of the genus and proposition of Burkholderia vietnamiensis sp. nov. for N2-fixing isolates from rice in Vietnam. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45(2): 274-89.
26
King E, Wallner A, Guigard L, et al. Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN colonization of rice endosphere triggers an atypical transcriptomic response compared to rice native Burkholderia s.l. endophytes. Sci Rep 2023; 13(1): 10696.
27
Romero-Gutiérrez KJ, Dourado MN, Garrido LM, et al. Phenotypic traits of Burkholderia spp. associated with ecological adaptation and plant-host interaction. Microbiol Res 2020; 236: 126451.
28
Meng XJ, Galileya Medison R, Cao S, et al. Isolation, identification, and biocontrol mechanisms of endophytic Burkholderia vietnamiensis C12 from Ficus tikoua Bur against Rhizoctonia solani. Biol Control 2023; 178: 105132.
29
Shinjo R, Uesaka K, Ihara K, et al. Draft genome sequence of Burkholderia vietnamiensis strain RS1, a nitrogen-fixing endophyte isolated from sweet potato. Microbiol Resour Announc 2018; 7(3): e00820-18.
30
Xin G, Zhang G, Kang JW, Staley JT, Doty SL. A diazotrophic, indole-3-acetic acid-producing endophyte from wild cottonwood. Biol Fertil Soils 2009; 45(6): 669-74.
31
Govindarajan M, Balandreau J, Kwon SW, Weon HY, Lakshminarasimhan C. Effects of the inoculation of Burkholderia vietnamensis and related endophytic diazotrophic bacteria on grain yield of rice. Microb Ecol 2008; 55(1): 21-37.
32
Araújo AES, Baldani VLD, Galisa PS, Pereira JA, Baldani JI. Response of traditional upland rice varieties to inoculation with selected diazotrophic bacteria isolated from rice cropped at the Northeast region of Brazil. Appl Soil Ecol 2013; 64: 49-55.
33
Estrada GA, Baldani VLD, de Oliveira DM, Urquiaga S, Baldani JI. Selection of phosphate-solubilizing diazotrophic Herbaspirillum and Burkholderia strains and their effect on rice crop yield and nutrient uptake. Plant Soil 2013; 369(1-2): 115-29.
34
Ríos-Ruiz WF, Torres-Chávez EE, Torres-Delgado J, Rojas-García JC, Bedmar EJ, Valdez-Nuñez RA. Inoculation of bacterial consortium increases rice yield (Oryza sativa L.) reducing applications of nitrogen fertilizer in San Martin region, Peru. Rhizosphere 2020; 14: 100200.
35
Valdez-Nuñez RA, Ríos-Ruiz WF, Ormeño-Orrillo E, Torres-Chávez EE, Torres-Delgado J. [Genetic characterization of rice endophytic bacteria (Oryza sativa L.) with antimicrobial activity against Burkholderia glumae.]. Rev Argent Microbiol 2020; 52(4): 315-27.
36
Kuang W, Chen W, Lei C, et al. Diversity of endophytic bacterial community in rice roots and their roles in phosphate solubilization and plant growth. Rhizosphere 2024; 30: 100877.
37
Liu M, Philp J, Wang Y, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Burkholderia vietnamiensis B418 inhibits root-knot nematode on watermelon by modifying the rhizosphere microbial community. Sci Rep 2022; 12(1): 8381.
38
Ji SH, Gururani MA, Chun SC. Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic diazotrophic bacteria from Korean rice cultivars. Microbiol Res 2014; 169(1): 83-98.
39
Baldani JI, Reis VM, Videira SS, Boddey LH, Baldani VLD. The art of isolating nitrogen-fixing bacteria from non-leguminous plants using N-free semi-solid media: a practical guide for microbiologists. Plant Soil 2014; 384(1-2): 413-31.
40
Sun L, Qiu F, Zhang X, Dai X, Dong X, Song W. Endophytic bacterial diversity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots estimated by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Microb Ecol 2008; 55(3): 415-24.
41
Baldani JI, Pot B, Kirchhof G, et al. Emended description of Herbaspirillum; inclusion of [Pseudomonas] rubrisubalbicans, a milk plant pathogen, as Herbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans comb. nov.; and classification of a group of clinical isolates (EF group 1) as Herbaspirillum species 3. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46(3): 802-10.
42
Garcia EC, Cotter PA. Burkholderia thailandensis: growth and laboratory maintenance. Curr Protoc Microbiol 2016; 42(1): 1.1-, 7.
43
Cui Z, Wang S, Kakar KU, et al. Genome sequence and adaptation analysis of the human and rice pathogenic strain Burkholderia glumae AU6208. Pathogens 2021; 10(2): 87.
44
Mahenthiralingam E, Bischof J, Byrne SK, et al. DNA-Based diagnostic approaches for identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex, Burkholderia vietnamiensis, Burkholderia multivorans, Burkholderia stabilis, and Burkholderia cepacia genomovars I and III. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38(9): 3165-73.
45
Koeuth T, Versalovic J, Lupski JR. Differential subsequence conservation of interspersed repetitive Streptococcus pneumoniae BOX elements in diverse bacteria. Genome Res 1995; 5(4): 408-18.
46
Arone G, Calderón C, Moreno S, Bedmar EJ. Identification of Ensifer strains isolated from root nodules of Medicago hispida grown in association with Zea mays in the Quechua region of the Peruvian Andes. Biol Fertil Soils 2014; 50(1): 185-90.
47
Garcia-Vallvé S, Palau J, Romeu A. Horizontal gene transfer in glycosyl hydrolases inferred from codon usage in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16(9): 1125-34.
48
Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. Numerical Taxonomy. Nature 1962; 193(4818): 855-60.
49
Jaccard P. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. 1. New Phytol 1912; 11(2): 37-50.
50
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215(3): 403-10.
51
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22(22): 4673-80.
52
Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4(4): 406-25.
53
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35(6): 1547-9.
54
Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16(2): 111-20.
55
Gravel V, Antoun H, Tweddell RJ. Effect of indole-acetic acid (IAA) on the development of symptoms caused by Pythium ultimum on tomato plants. Eur J Plant Pathol 2007; 119(4): 457-62.
56
Rios-Ruiz WF, Tuanama-Reátegui C, Huamán-Córdova G, Valdez-Nuñez RA. Co-Inoculation of endophytes Bacillus siamensis TUR07-02b and Priestia megaterium SMBH14-02 promotes growth in rice with low doses of nitrogen fertilizer. Plants 2023; 12(3): 524.
57
Zapater R. Evaluation of the rhizosphere/soil coefficient (R/S), under maize in relation to free-living nitrogen fixing bacteria. Anales Científicos 1975; 13: 45-57.
58
Schwyn B, Neilands JB. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 1987; 160(1): 47-56.
59
Bahena MHR, Salazar S, Velázquez E, Laguerre G, Peix A. Characterization of phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria associated with pea (Pisum sativum L.) isolated from two agricultural soils. Symbiosis 2015; 67(1-3): 33-41.
60
Marciano Marra L, Fonsêca Sousa Soares CR, de Oliveira SM, et al. Biological nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization by bacteria isolated from tropical soils. Plant Soil 2012; 357(1-2): 289-307.
61
Song OR, Lee SJ, Lee YS, Lee SC, Kim KK, Choi YL. Solubilization of insoluble inorganic phosphate by Burkholderia cepacia DA23 isolated from cultivated soil. Braz J Microbiol 2008; 39(1): 151-6.
62
Nautiyal CS. An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999; 170(1): 265-70.
63
Murphy J, Riley JP. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 1962; 27: 31-6.
64
Castellano-Hinojosa A, Bedmar E. Methods for evaluating plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria traits 2017; 225-74.
65
Granada CE, Arruda L, Lisboa BB, Passaglia LMP, Vargas LK. Diversity of native rhizobia isolated in south Brazil and their growth promotion effect on white clover (Trifolium repens) and rice (Oryza sativa) plants. Biol Fertil Soils 2014; 50(1): 123-32.
66
Wallner A, Klonowska A, Guigard L, et al. Comparative genomics and transcriptomic response to root exudates of six rice root-associated Burkholderia sensu lato species. Peer Community Journal 2023; 3: e25.
67
Ferreira E, Nogueira M, Hungria M. Manual of analysis of bioinputs for agricultural use: Inoculants 2024.
68
Tarciana OV, Joelma SS, Celsiane M, Renato VSM, Vera LDB, Joilson SF. Isolation and inoculation of diazotrophic bacteria in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in Vitoria da Conquista - BA. Afr J Agric Res 2015; 10(29): 2847-54.
69
Shabanamol S, Divya K, George TK, Rishad KS, Sreekumar TS, Jisha MS. Characterization and in planta nitrogen fixation of plant growth promoting endophytic diazotrophic Lysinibacillus sphaericus isolated from rice (Oryza sativa). Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 2018; 102: 46-54.
70
Banik A, Dash GK, Swain P, Kumar U, Mukhopadhyay SK, Dangar TK. Application of rice (Oryza sativa L.) root endophytic diazotrophic Azotobacter sp. strain Avi2 (MCC 3432) can increase rice yield under green house and field condition. Microbiol Res 2019; 219: 56-65.
71
Madhaiyan M, Selvakumar G, Alex TH, Cai L, Ji L. Plant growth promoting abilities of novel Burkholderia-related genera and their interactions with some economically important tree species. Front Sustain Food Syst 2021; 5: 618305.
72
Estrada-De Los Santos P, Bustillos-Cristales R, Caballero-Mellado J. Burkholderia, a genus rich in plant-associated nitrogen fixers with wide environmental and geographic distribution. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67(6): 2790-8.
73
Samuel SO, Suzuki K, Asiloglu R, Harada N. Rice endophytic communities are strongly dependent on microbial communities specific to each soil. Biol Fertil Soils 2023; 59(7): 733-46.
74
Payne GW, Vandamme P, Morgan SH, et al. Development of a recA gene-based identification approach for the entire Burkholderia genus. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005; 71(7): 3917-27.
75
Spilker T, Baldwin A, Bumford A, Dowson CG, Mahenthiralingam E, LiPuma JJ. Expanded multilocus sequence typing for burkholderia species. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47(8): 2607-10.
76
Depoorter E, De Canck E, Peeters C, et al. Burkholderia cepacia complex taxon K: Where to split? Front Microbiol 2020; 11: 1594.
77
Velez LS, Aburjaile FF, Farias ARG, et al. Burkholderia semiarida sp. nov. and Burkholderia sola sp. nov., two novel B. cepacia complex species causing onion sour skin. Syst Appl Microbiol 2023; 46(3): 126415.
78
Valdez-Nuñez R, Ramos-Luna L, Meza-Catalán P, et al. Genetic diversity and virulence of phytopathogenic burkholderia glumae strains isolated from rice cultivars in valleys of the high jungle of Perú. Plant Dis 2024; 108(8): 2376-88.
79
Etesami H, Glick BR. Bacterial indole-3-acetic acid: A key regulator for plant growth, plant-microbe interactions, and agricultural adaptive resilience. Microbiol Res 2024; 281: 127602.
80
Govindarajan M, Balandreau J, Muthukumarasamy R, Revathi G, Lakshminarasimhan C. Improved yield of micropropagated sugarcane following inoculation by endophytic Burkholderia vietnamiensis. Plant Soil 2006; 280(1-2): 239-52.
81
Nguyen V, Mai D, Chu H, Le T. In vitro screening of siderophore-producing rice root endophytic bacteria from up-land paddies in north-western Vietnam for plant growth-promoting activities. Malays J Microbiol 2021; 18
82
Kamilova F, Kravchenko LV, Shaposhnikov AI, Azarova T, Makarova N, Lugtenberg B. Organic acids, sugars, and L-tryptophane in exudates of vegetables growing on stonewool and their effects on activities of rhizosphere bacteria. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2006; 19(3): 250-6.
83
Meyer JM, Van Van T, Stintzi A, Berge O, Winkelmann G. Ornibactin production and transport properties in strains of Burkholderia vietnamiensis and Burkholderia cepacia (formerly Pseudomonas cepacia). Biometals 1995; 8(4): 309-17.
84
Conway BA, Greenberg EP. Quorum-sensing signals and quorum-sensing genes in Burkholderia vietnamiensis. J Bacteriol 2002; 184(4): 1187-91.
85
Timofeeva AM, Galyamova MR, Sedykh SE. Bacterial siderophores: Classification, biosynthesis, perspectives of use in agriculture. Plants 2022; 11(22): 3065.
86
Park KH, Lee OM, Jung HI, et al. Rapid solubilization of insoluble phosphate by a novel environmental stress-tolerant Burkholderia vietnamiensis M6 isolated from ginseng rhizospheric soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010; 86(3): 947-55.
87
Bashan Y, Kamnev AA, de-Bashan LE. Tricalcium phosphate is inappropriate as a universal selection factor for isolating and testing phosphate-solubilizing bacteria that enhance plant growth: A proposal for an alternative procedure. Biol Fertil Soils 2013; 49(4): 465-79.
88
Trân Van V, Berge O, Ngô Kê S, Balandreau J, Heulin T. Repeated beneficial effects of rice inoculation with a strain of Burkholderia vietnamiensis on early and late yield components in low fertility sulphate acid soils of Vietnam. Plant Soil 2000; 218(2): 273-84.
89
King E, Wallner A, Rimbault I, et al. Monitoring of rice transcriptional responses to contrasted colonizing patterns of phytobeneficial Burkholderia sl reveals a temporal shift in JA systemic response. Front Plant Sci 2019; 10: 1141.
90
Pal G, Saxena S, Kumar K, et al. Endophytic Burkholderia: Multifunctional roles in plant growth promotion and stress tolerance. Microbiol Res 2022; 265: 127201.
91
Gholami A, Biyari A, Gholipoor M, Asadi Rahmani H. Growth promotion of maize ( Zea mays L.) by plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria under field conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 2012; 43(9): 1263-72.
92
Zhao J, Zhao X, Wang J, Gong Q, Zhang X, Zhang G. Isolation, identification and characterization of endophytic bacterium Rhizobium oryzihabitans sp. nov., from rice root with biotechnological potential in agriculture. Microorganisms 2020; 8(4): 608.
93
Bach E, Sant’Anna FH, Seger GDS, Passaglia LMP. Pangenome inventory of Burkholderia sensu lato, Burkholderia sensu stricto, and the Burkholderia cepacia complex reveals the uniqueness of Burkholderia catarinensis. Genomics 2022; 114(1): 398-408.
94
Sharma A, Shankhdhar D, Sharma A, Shankhdhar SC. Growth promotion of the rice genotypes by pgprs isolated from rice rhizosphere. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2014; 14(ahead): 0.
95
Belimov AA, Puhalsky IV, Safronova VI, et al. Role of plant genotype and soil conditions in symbiotic plant-microbe interactions for adaptation of plants to cadmium-polluted soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 2015; 226(8): 264.
96
Ahmed S, Heo TY, Roy Choudhury A, Walitang DI, Choi J, Sa T. Accumulation of compatible solutes in rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars by inoculation of endophytic plant growth promoting bacteria to alleviate salt stress. Applied Biological Chemistry 2021; 64(1): 68.
97
Wang Y, Duan S, Xu J, et al. Comparison of the colonization ability of Burkholderia strain B23 in the citrus rhizoplane and rhizosphere and assessment of the underlying mechanisms using full‐length 16S rDNA amplicon and metatranscriptomic analyses. Microb Biotechnol 2023; 16(8): 1657-70.
98
Wang Y, Huang W, Ali SW, Li Y, Yu F, Deng H. Isolation, Identification, and characterization of an efficient siderophore producing bacterium from heavy metal contaminated soil. Curr Microbiol 2022; 79(8): 227.
99
Cuong ND, Nicolaisen MH, Sørensen J, Olsson S. Hyphae-colonizing Burkholderia sp.--A new source of biological control agents against sheath blight disease (Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA) in rice. Microb Ecol 2011; 62(2): 425-34.
100
Zhang X, Huang Y, Harvey PR, et al. Enhancing plant disease suppression by Burkholderia vietnamiensis through chromosomal integration of Bacillus subtilis chitinase gene chi113. Biotechnol Lett 2012; 34(2): 287-93.
101
Sivaji M, Vinoth R, Tamilkumar P, Kumar SS, Chandrasekar A, Syamala M. Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting Burkholderia spp. Int J Plant Prot 2016; 9(1): 223-9.
102
Liu LM, Zhao KH, Zhao Y, Zhang YL, Fu Q, Huang SW. Nigrospora oryzae causing panicle branch rot disease on Oryza sativa (rice). Plant Dis 2021; 105(9): 2724.
103
Garrido M, Vilela N. Antagonistic capacity of Trichoderma harzianum against Rhizoctonia, Nakatea sigmoidea and Sclerotium rolfsii and its effect on native strains of Trichoderma isolated from rice crops. Agric Sci 2019; 10: 199-206.
104
Cartwright DK, Chilton WS, Benson DM. Pyrrolnitrin and phenazine production by Pseudomonas cepacia, strain 5.5B, a biocontrol agent of Rhizoctonia solani. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1995; 43(2): 211-6.
105
Rojas-Rojas FU, Salazar-Gómez A, Vargas-Díaz ME, et al. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity by Burkholderia cenocepacia TAtl-371, a strain isolated from the tomato rhizosphere. Microbiology (Reading) 2018; 164(9): 1072-86.
106
Saalim M, Villegas-Moreno J, Clark BR. Bacterial alkyl-4-quinolones: Discovery, structural diversity and biological properties. Molecules 2020; 25(23): 5689.
107
Lu SE, Novak J, Austin FW, et al. Occidiofungin, a unique antifungal glycopeptide produced by a strain of Burkholderia contaminans. Biochemistry 2009; 48(35): 8312-21.