RESEARCH ARTICLE


Molecular Characterization using Directed Amplification ‎of Minisatellite-region DNA (DAMD) Marker in Ficus Sycomorus L. (Moraceae)



Basel Saleh*
Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, P.O. Box 6091, Damascus, Syria


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 556
Abstract HTML Views: 300
PDF Downloads: 165
ePub Downloads: 137
Total Views/Downloads: 1158
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 328
Abstract HTML Views: 215
PDF Downloads: 120
ePub Downloads: 92
Total Views/Downloads: 755



© 2019 Basel Saleh.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Correspondence: Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, P.O. Box 6091, Damascus, Syria; Tel: 0096311-213580; Fax: 0096311-6112289; E-mails: ascientific@aec.org.sy; bsaleh@aec.org.sy


Abstract

Background:

Ficus sycomorus L. species exhibited great importance with various applications in pharmacology and medicine studies. However, little attention has been given to its molecular characterization.

Objective:

The study aimed to assess DNA genetic diversity among 16 genotypes of F. sycomorus L. species.

Methods:

Directed Amplification of Minisatellite-region DNA (DAMD) marker has been employed to investigate the genetic relationship among the studied genotypes of F. sycomorus L. species based on the estimated Percent Disagreement Values (PDV).

Results:

Twenty-four DAMD primers produced 194 bands, of which, 145 (74.742%) were polymorphic with Polymorphic Information Content (PIC) average of 0.219. DAMD-PCR application highlighted 12 unique markers characteristic for some studied genotypes. Cluster analysis showed that the studied F. sycomorus L. genotypes were split into two main distinguished clusters, each one was considered as a subspecies. In this respect, F. sycomorus14 and F. sycomorus15 genotypes were considered as subspecies too far from the second one containing the remaining genotypes.

Conclusion:

The DAMD assay successfully highlighted genetic diversity within F. sycomorus species. More accurate molecular markers are required to confirm the current data.

Keywords: Ficus sycomorus L., DAMD, Molecular marker, Genotype, Genetic diversity, PDV.



1. INTRODUCTION

Ficus sycomorus L. (Moraceae) species is characterized by its geographic diversity due to its adaptation to different environmental conditions. Assessment of genetic diversity of F. sycomorus L., as in the case of other fruit trees, is important not only in evolutionary studies, but also in the breeding and conservation programs of germplasm. It has been demonstrated that the existence of 400 monoecious and 800 gynodioecious species belonged to the Ficus genus [1, 2]. Overall, F. sycomorus L. species taxonomically is classified as a subgenus of the fig, belonging to the Moraceae family.

It was originated in Ethiopia and Central Africa, and planted since antiquity in Egypt, Palestine, Lebanon and Syria. Since a long time ago, Mouterde [3] reported that this species is at risk due to urban development, with little occurrence of this species in Sida and Syrian littoral zones.

This study is part of a series of studies currently underway in Syria and around the world under the project of biodiversity and the inventory of genetic resources, especially those neglected and marginalized to benefit food, medicine and genetic improvement programs to combat diseases, insects and abiotic stresses and a part of the efforts being made to expand their cultivation. F. sycomorus L. species displayed an important role as a coastal plant, genetically resource tolerant to salinity, as a food (their fruit) and medical treatment [2, 4].

Many DNA-PCR based markers are successfully employed worldwide for investigation of DNA genetic diversity in plants kingdom. Of the available techniques, Directed Amplification of Minisatellite-region DNA (DAMD) technique has been developed by Heath et al. [5] and revealed polymorphism due to minisatellites. Since this technique is carried out at higher PCR-stringencies, the patterns produced have a greater reproducibility than Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [6]. It has been documented that minisatellites called as the Variable Number of Tandem Repeats (VNTR), are tandem repeats of 10-60 bp long DNA sequence motif and are widely distributed throughout the eukaryote genome. The variation in these repeats is proved to be the source of the polymorphism in several organisms [7].

It has been demonstrated that these minisatellites and DNA sequences flanking them are involved in inversions, which result in their distribution on both the strands in opposite orientations. This makes PCR possible using a minisatellite core sequence as a single primer. Moreover, these minisatellites have characteristics of inheritance in Mendelian fashion and extensive genome coverage [5].

A DAMD marker has been widely used for genetic characterization of many plant species including Oryza [8], Morus spp [9], Panax spp [10], Shorea curtisii [11], Capsicum [12], Convolvulus [13], Astragalus rhizanthus complex [14], common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) [15], cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) [16], grapevine [17], mango [18], Citrus [19], chickpea [20], Jatropha [21], Flavoparmelia caperata L [22], Dianthus L [23]. and recently, in Citrus [24] and Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw [25].

The utility of DAMD marker, however, has not been widely reported in F. sycomorus L. germplasm characteriz ation. Thereby, the current study aimed to assess the phylogenetic relationship among F. Sycom genotypes (scattered in various areas of the Syrian coast) along with the precise identification of the subspecies belonging to the F. sycomorus species, especially since there is no precise inventory of the number of subspecies of this species in Syria and to find specific molecular markers of this species using the DAMD assay.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

2.1. Plant Materials

Sixteen F. sycomorus leaves samples were collected from the coastal regions of Syria (Table 1). Five to ten leaves from each genotype were bulked as one sample for DNA extraction. Table 1 shows characteristic collection sites in terms of the original site, altitude and annual rainfall. Sample collection has been performed in autumn as previously reported by Saleh [2].

2.2. DNA Extraction

Total genomic DNA of each genotype has been performed by a CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) protocol as described by Doyle and Doyle [26]. The concentration of DNA was measured by the DNA fluorimeter and kept at –80°C until use.

2.3. DAMD-PCR Assay

Twenty-four DAMD primers were tested as previously reported in other species [9, 14, 17]. DAMD-PCR amplific ation reaction was carried out in 25 μl reaction volume containing 1X PCR buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM dNTPs, 25 pmol primer, 1.5 unit of Taq DNA polymerase and 50 ng template DNA. PCR amplification was performed in a T-gradient thermal cycler (Bio-Rad; T-Gradient). It was programmed to 35 cycles after an initial denaturation cycle for 4 min at 94ºC. Each cycle consisted of a denaturation step for 1 min at 94ºC, an annealing step for 2 min at Tm varying according to each examined primer (Table 2), and an extension step at 72ºC for 2 min, followed by extension cycle for 7 min at 72ºC in the final cycle. PCR products were then separated on a 1.8% ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel (Bio-Rad) in 0.5X TBE buffer. Electrophoresis was performed for 2 h at 100 V and visualized with a UV transilluminator. A standard VC 100bp Plus DNA Ladder (Vivantis) was used to estimate the molecular weight of DAMD-PCR amplification products.

Table 1. Geographical regions in terms of original sites including their altitude (m) and annual rainfall (mm) in which the 16 F. sycomorus genotypes were collected.
Genotype Code Original Site Altitude (m) Annual Rainfall (mm) References
F. sycomor 1 Lattakia 4.5 650-700 [2]
F. sycomor 2 Lattakia 6.5 650-700 Current study
F. sycomor 3 Lattakia 6.3 650-700 [2]
F. sycomor 4 Lattakia 6.5 650-700 Current study
F. sycomor 5 Lattakia 5 650-700 Current study
F. sycomor 6 Lattakia 5 650-700 Current study
F. sycomor 7 Lattakia 5 650-700 Current study
F. sycomor 8 Lattakia 5 650-700 Current study
F. sycomor 9 Lattakia 4 650-700 Current study
F. sycomor 10 Lattakia 6.3 650-700 [2]
F. sycomor 11 Lattakia 5 650-700 Current study
F. sycomor 12 Jableh 11.8 650-700 [2]
F. sycomor 13 Banyas 10 700-750 [2]
F. sycomor 14 Banyas 220 ~850 [2]
F. sycomor 15 Banyas 12 700-750 Current study
F. sycomor 16 Banyas 250 ~850 [2]
Table 2. DAMD primers tested in the current study in terms of primer name, primer sequence and temperature annealing (°C).
Primer Number Primer Name Primer Sequence 5'-3' Source Species Ta (°C) References
1 URP1F ATCCAAGGTCCGAGACAACC Rice 55 [16]
2 URP2R CCCAGCAACTGATCGCACAC Rice 61 [16]
3 URP4R AGGACTCGATAACAGGCTCC Rice 58 [16]
4 URP9F ATGTGTGCGATCAGTTGCTG Rice 60 [16]
5 URP25F GATGTGTTCTTGGAGCCTGT Rice 58 [16]
6 HVR(-) CCTCCTCCCTCCT Rice 50 [16]
7 OGRB01 AGGGCTGGAGGAGGGC Rice 55 [16]
8 FVIIex8C CCTGTGTGTGTGCAT Human 47 [16]
9 HBV3 GGTGAAGCACAGGTG Human 53 [16]
10 HBV5 GGTGTAGAGAGGGGT Human 56 [16]
11 YNZ22 CTCTGGGTGTGGTGC Human 56 [16]
12 14C2 GGCAGGATTGAAGC Human 53 [16]
13 33.6 GGAGGTGGGCA Human 52 [16]
14 6.2H(+) AGGAGGAGGGGAAGG Human 56 [16]
15 M13 GAGGGTGGCGGCTCT Phage M13 57 [16]
16 HBVb GGTGTAGAGAGAGGGGT Rice 52 [9]
17 HVRc CCTCCTCCCTCCT Rice 52 [9]
18 URP2F GTGTGCGATCAGTTGCTGGG Rice 50 [17]
19 URP6R GGCAAGCTGGTGGGAGGTAC Rice 50 [17]
20 URP13R TACATCGCAAGTGACACAGG Rice 50 [17]
21 URP17R AATGTGGGCAAGCTGGTGGT Rice 50 [17]
22 M13 GAGGGTGGCGGTTCCT Rice 55 [14]
23 HVA AGGATGGAAAGGAGGC Rice 55 [14]
24 HVY GCCTTTCCCGAG Rice 55 [14]

2.4. DAMD Analysis

The presence or absence of each size class was scored as 1 or 0, respectively. The Percent Disagreement Values (PDV) found were used to generate a matrix via the Unweighted Pair Group Mean Arithmetic average (UPGMA) using Statistica program [27]. Then the previous matrix was used to estimate genetic similarity [28]. Polymorphic Information Content (PIC) value was estimated for each DAMD primer according to the formula:

PIC = 1 ‒ Σ(Pij)2

Where Pij is the frequency of the ith pattern revealed by the jth primer summed across all the patterns revealed by the primers [29].

3. RESULTS

The size of DAMD-PCR amplification products ranged between 100-1500 bp. Fig. (1) shows polymorphic patterns within F. sycomorus L. species produced by 14C2 (a) and URP17R (b) DAMD primers.

The DAMD marker applied in the molecular study within F. sycomorus L. species, produced total bands number (TB) of 194 bands, of which, 145 were polymorphic (PB) representing percentage polymorphism (P%) of 74.742% (Table 3). Data showed that TB ranged between 4 [URP1F & 6.2h(+)] and 19 (URP4R) with a mean average of 8.083 bands/ primer. Whereas, PB ranged between 2 [URP9F, HVR(-), 6.2H(+) and URP6R] and 19 (URP4R) with a mean average of 6.042 bands/ primer (Table 3). As for estimated PIC, it ranged between 0.098 (URP6R) and 0.369 (M13) with a mean average of 0.219 (Table 3).

The DAMD assay successfully produced twelve unique markers, characterized F. sycomorus genotypes (Table 4).

Based on UPGMA, Fig. (2) shows that the studied F. sycomorus genotypes were clustered into two main clusters. The first cluster contained F. sycomorus14 and F. sycomorus15 genotypes, whereas, the second one contained three subclusters. The first subcluster contained F. sycomorus1, F. sycomorus2, F. sycomorus3, F. sycomorus4, F. sycomorus5 and F. sycomorus11 genotypes (Fig. 2), where, F. sycomorus2 and F. sycomorus3 were too closed with the PDV value of 0.13 (Table 5). Indeed, F. sycomorus4 and F. sycomorus5 were also too closed with the PDV value of 0.17. Whereas, the second subcluster contained F. sycomorus6, F. sycomorus7, F. sycomorus8, F. sycomorus9 and F. sycomorus10 genotypes, where, F. sycomorus7 and F. sycomorus8 were the closets genotypes with the lowest PDV of 0.10. Indeed, F. sycomorus9 and F. sycomorus10 were also too closed with the PDV value of 0.18, while, the third subcluster contained F. sycomorus12, F. sycomorus13 and F. sycomorus16 genotypes, where, F. sycomorus12 and F. sycomorus13 were too closed with the PDV value of 0.16 (Table 5). The DAMD marker revealed that the lowest PDV was recorded to be 0.10 between F. sycomorus6 & F. sycomorus7 and between F. sycomorus7 & F. sycomorus8 genotypes with the highest genetic similarity of 0.831 and 0.830, respectively. Whereas, the highest one was recorded to be 0.38 between F. sycomorus8 & F. sycomorus15 (with a similarity of 0.526); F. sycomorus7 & F. sycomorus15 (with a similarity of 0.523) and F. sycomorus12 & F. sycomorus15 (with a similarity of 0.500) genotypes. It worth noting that the latest genotypes were genetically too far, exhibiting a high PDV of 0.38 than the mean PDV of 0.24.

Fig. (1). DAMD polymorphism produced by 14C2 (a), and URP17R (b) tested primers among the 16 F. sycomorus studied genotypes. M: A VC 100bp Plus DNA Ladder (Vivantis) ladder standard.

Fig. (2). Cluster analysis generated using UPGMA analysis, showing relationships among the 16 F. sycomorus studied genotypes based on DAMD data.

Table 3. Banding pattern of DAMD amplified fragments scored.
Primer Number Primer Name TB PB P% PIC
1 URP1F 4 3 75.000 0.178
2 URP2R 11 11 100.000 0.363
3 URP4R 19 19 100.000 0.366
4 URP9F 5 2 40.000 0.173
5 URP25F 7 4 57.143 0.141
6 HVR(-) 6 2 33.333 0.099
7 OGRB01 9 6 66.667 0.22
8 FVIIex8C 10 8 80.000 0.191
9 HBV3 14 10 71.429 0.235
10 HBV5 6 4 66.667 0.202
11 YNZ22 9 4 44.444 0.145
12 14C2 7 5 71.429 0.166
13 33.6 7 5 71.429 0.166
14 6.2H(+) 4 2 50.000 0.152
15 M13 9 8 88.889 0.297
16 HBVb 6 5 83.333 0.323
17 HVRc 6 4 66.667 0.178
18 URP2F 7 5 71.429 0.246
19 URP6R 5 2 40.000 0.098
20 URP13R 9 7 77.778 0.202
21 URP17R 9 6 66.667 0.179
22 M13 11 11 100.000 0.369
23 HVA 6 4 66.667 0.268
24 HVY 8 8 100.000 0.287
Total 194 145
average 8.083 6.042 70.374 0.219
TB ‒ Total Bands; PB ‒ Polymorphic Bands; P (%) ‒ Polymorphic % and PIC ‒ Polymorphic Information Content.
Table 4. Molecular weights of unique fragments based on DAMD data.
Genotype Code Original SiteS Primer Unique Positive Marker Molecular Weight (bp)
F. sycomor 1 Lattakia FVIIex8C ~150
F. sycomor 1 Lattakia 33.6 500
F. sycomor 1 Lattakia URP2F ~290
F. sycomor 4 Lattakia URP25F ~150
F. sycomor 6 Lattakia URP13R 200
F. sycomor 8 Lattakia URP4R ~450
F. sycomor 9 Lattakia HVRc 200
F. sycomor 9 Lattakia HVY 200
F. sycomor 13 Banyas URP4R ~150
F. sycomor 13 Banyas FVIIex8C ~1100
F. sycomor 14 Banyas URP4R 900
F. sycomor 14 Banyas HBV3 1500
F. sycomor 15 Banyas 33.6 1000
F. sycomor 15 Banyas URP2F 100
F. sycomor 15 Banyas URP6R 800
F. sycomor 15 Banyas URP13R ~450
F. sycomor 15 Banyas M13 ~150
F. sycomor 16 Banyas URP1F ~190
F. sycomor 16 Banyas 6.2H(+) 200
Table 5. Percent disagreement values (PDV) generated by DAMD data based on UPGMA routine in statistical program.
Genotype F. syc1 F. syc2 F. syc3 F. syc4 F. syc5 F. syc6 F. syc7 F. syc8 F. syc9 F. syc10 F. syc11 F. syc12 F. syc13 F. syc14 F. syc15 F. syc16
F. syc1 0.00
F. syc2 0.19 0.00
F. syc3 0.23 0.13 0.00
F. syc4 0.22 0.17 0.21 0.00
F. syc5 0.23 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.00
F. syc6 0.29 0.21 0.27 0.21 0.21 0.00
F. syc7 0.29 0.25 0.28 0.22 0.24 0.10 0.00
F. syc8 0.27 0.23 0.27 0.19 0.24 0.17 0.10 0.00
F. syc9 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.16 0.00
F. syc10 0.24 0.22 0.24 0.22 0.24 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.00
F. syc11 0.23 0.25 0.26 0.23 0.24 0.32 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.21 0.00
F. syc12 0.25 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.29 0.30 0.26 0.25 0.28 0.18 0.22 0.00
F. syc13 0.27 0.24 0.31 0.24 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.24 0.30 0.19 0.27 0.16 0.00
F. syc14 0.31 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.32 0.30 0.32 0.35 0.27 0.28 0.31 0.25 0.00
F. syc15 0.37 0.31 0.37 0.35 0.36 0.32 0.38 0.38 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.38 0.30 0.27 0.00
F. syc16 0.26 0.23 0.26 0.25 0.29 0.28 0.23 0.23 0.26 0.24 0.27 0.23 0.25 0.29 0.35 0.00

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

DNA genetic diversity among 16 genotypes of F. sycomorus L. species has been assessed using 24 DAMD primers. Data showed that TB ranged between 4-19 bands with a mean average of 8.083 bands/ primer, whereas, PB ranged between 2-19 bands with a mean average of 6.042 bands/ primer. Another investigation by Saleh [2] reported DNA genetic diversity among 10 F. sycomorus genotypes using RAPD and Inter-retrotransposon Amplified Polymorphism (IRAP) markers. The previous study revealed that the RAPD marker produced TB ranging between 5-21 bands with an average of 9.778 bands/primer and PB ranging between 2-16 bands with an average of 7 bands/primer. Whereas, in IRAP marker case, TB ranged between 7-17 bands with an average of 11.125 bands/primer and PB ranged between 3-15 bands with an average of 9.438 bands/primer.

Previously, Zhou et al. [8] reported high levels of variation between different species and little variation between different cultivars of O. sativa using DAMD. Whereas, Ince et al. [12] reported that TB varied from 1 to 12 fragments combined with a total of 38 accession-specific DNA markers in Capsicum using 22 DAMD primers.

Moreover, Seyedimoradi et al. [17] reported a DAMD marker for characterizing 21 grapevine accessions from Iran. The previous study revealed that P% average was recorded to be 66% with a PIC average value of 0.44. Indeed, genetic dissimilarity of genotypes ranged from 0.12 to 0.67. Srivastava et al. [18] applied 4 DAMD primers for genetic diversity studying among 46 mango varieties. They reported 110 (with P%=87.3%) fragments with a PIC value of 0.245. In addition, Kumar and Nair [19] applied 4 DAMD primers to study phylo genetic relationships among 50 wild and cultivated accessions of 19 Indian Citrus genotypes. They reported a total of 45 bands, of which 35 (78%) were polymorphic with a mean genetic similarity of 0.68, indicating moderate genetic divergence among the studied accessions. Moreover, Pakseresht et al. [20] reported a DAMD marker for studying phylogenetic relationships of 40 landraces chickpea genotypes in Iran. The previous study revealed the PIC average 0.232, whereas, Murty et al. [21] applied 4 DAMD primers for studying genetic diversity in 19 Jatropha accessions. The previous study revealed that P% average was 91.02% with a mean PIC value 0.873. Indeed, Ince and karaca [23] applied 22 DAMD primers to study genetic diversity in Dianthus L. genus. The previous study revealed that TB varied between 36-168 bands and PB varied between 19-120 bands with P% ranging between 37.3-100% and PIC values ranging between 0.120-0.341.

Recently, Pinar et al. [24] applied 20 DAMD primers for Citrus molecular characterization. The previous study revealed that DAMD marker gave 296 total bands, of which, 296 (100%) were polymorphic with an average of 14.8 bands/primer. Whereas, Jain et al. [25] applied 12 DAMD primers for Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw. molecular study. They reported a total of 97 bands (average of 8.033 bands/primer) of which 92 (average of 7.667 bands/primer) were polymorphic with P% of 94.845%.

The current study revealed that DAMD assay produced 194 bands, of which, 145 (74.742%) were polymorphic with a PIC average value of 0.219. Saleh [2] however, reported the molecular characterization of 10 F. sycomorus genotypes using 36 RAPD and 22 IRAP primers. The previous study revealed that RAPD assay produced 352 distinguished bands, of which 252 (71.59%) were polymorphic. As for IRAP assay, there were 178 bands, of which, 151 (84.83%) were polymorphic. Moreover, the mean PIC value was recorded to be 0.215 and 0.299 for RAPD and IRAP assays, respectively.

It worth noting that our data presented herein were comparable with that reported by Saleh [2]. Since, the effectiveness of a molecular marker for detection of DNA genetic diversity is based on P% and PIC values resulting from the application of the given marker, in this respect, in our case study, the DAMD marker was more effective than RAPD by showing the highest P% (74.742%) and PIC (0.219) values compared to RAPD with the lowest P% (71.59%) and PIC (0.215) values. This observation was in agreement with Karaca and Ince [6] who reported that the DAMD marker was more effective than the RAPD one. While, the DAMD marker was less effective than the IRAP one in the study by Saleh [2], where, IRAP marker exhibited the highest P% (84.83%) and PIC (0.299) values than that those reported in the current study.

Overall, based on data previously reported by Saleh [2] and herein regarding P% and PIC values, we could suggest that moderate genetic divergence was observed among the tested F. sycomorus genotypes.

From data presented herein, the current study could suggest that the 16 studied F. sycomorus genotypes belonged to two separate distinguished subspecies; the first subspecies contained F. sycomorus14 and F. sycomorus15 genotypes. Whereas, the second subspecies contained the remaining studied genotypes.

Overall, the DNA genetic diversity detected among the studied F. sycomorus genotypes was not observed to be related to their geographical distribution, but could be related to their common origin as previously reported by Saleh [2] who stated similar observation within F. sycomorus species. This finding was coherent with those reported by Machado et al. [30], showing the evolution of Ficus monoecious origin into gynodioecious types. Other studies, however, reported similar findings related to Tunisian fig based on the RAPD assay application [31].

In conclusion, data presented herein using the DAMD maker and in the previous study [2] using RAPD and IRAP markers, highlighted moderate genetic divergence among the studied F. sycomorus genotypes. Overall, the current study suggests that the studied F. sycomorus genotypes were split into two main subspecies. Indeed, DAMD-PCR assay successfully highlighted 12 unique markers characterized some studied genotypes. Thereby, due to the importance of F. sycomorus as a coastal species and to confirm the actual results obtained regarding the mentioned species for DNA genetic diversity; further research works like e.g. Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) are required to confirm the number of sub species to which F. sycomorus trees growing in Syria belong; especially, there is no precise inventory of the number of subspecies of this species in Syria.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

CTAB = Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide
DAMD = Directed Amplification ‎of Minisatellite-region DNA
IRAP = Inter-retrotransposon Amplified Polymorphism
P% = Percentage Polymorphism
PB = Polymorphic Bands
PIC = Polymorphic Information Content
PDV = Percent Disagreement Values
RAPD = Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA
SSRs = Simple Sequence Repeats
TB = Total Bands
UPGMA = Unweighted Pair Group Mean Arithmetic Average
VNTR = Variable Number of Tandem Repeats

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No animals/humans were used for studies that are the basis of this research.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

Not applicable.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declares no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I thank Dr. I. Othman (Director General of AECS) and Dr. N. Mirali (Head of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Department in AECS) for their support, and also the Plant Biotechnology group for technical assistance.

REFERENCES

[1] Al Malki AAHS, Elmeer KMS. Influence of auxin and cytokinine on in vitro multiplication of Ficus Anastasia. Afr J Biotechnol 2010; 9(5): 635-9. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB09.1168].
[2] Saleh B. Genetic diversity in Ficus sycomorus L. species (Moraceae) using RAPD and IRAP markers. Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo) 2013; 59(3): 120-30.
[3] Mouterde P. Nouvelle flore du Liban et de la Syrie 1966; 1(Texte): 371-2.
[4] Saleh B, Hammoud R, Al-Mariri A. Antimicrobial activity of Ficus sycomorus L. (Moraceae) leaf and stem-bark extracts against multidrug resistant human pathogens. Herba Pol 2015; 61(1): 39-49.
[5] Heath DD, Iwama GK, Devlin RH. PCR primed with VNTR core sequences yields species specific patterns and hypervariable probes. Nucleic Acids Res 1993; 21(24): 5782-5.
[6] Karaca M, Ince AG. Minisatellites as DNA markers to classify bermudagrasses (Cynodon spp.): Confirmation of minisatellite in amplified products. J Genet 2008; 87(1): 83-6.
[7] Winberg BC, Zhou Z, Dallas JF, McIntyre CL, Gustafson JP. Characterization of minisatellite sequences from Oryza sativa. Genome 1993; 36(5): 978-83.
[8] Zhou Z, Bebeli PJ, Somers DJ, Gustafson JP. Direct amplification of minisatellite-region DNA with VNTR core sequences in the genus Oryza. Theor Appl Genet 1997; 95(5): 942-9.
[9] Bhattacharya E, Ranade SA. Molecular distinction amongst varieties of mulberry using RAPD and DAMD profiles. BMC Plant Biol 2001; 1(3): 3.
[10] Ha WY, Shaw PC, Liu J, Yau FC, Wang J. Authentication of Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and directed amplification of minisatellite region DNA (DAMD). J Agric Food Chem 2002; 50(7): 1871-5.
[11] Ho WS, Wickneswari R, Mahani MC, Shukor MN. Comparative genetic diversity studies of Shorea curtisii (dipterocarpaceae): An assessment using SSR and DAMD markers. J Trop For Sci 2006; 18(22): 22-35.
[12] Ince AG, Karaca M, Onus AN. Development and utilization of diagnostic DAMD-PCR markers for Capsicum accessions. Genet Resour Crop Evol 2009; 56(2): 211-21.
[13] Ince AG, Aykurt C, Karaca M, et al. CAPS and DAMD-PCR assays for species identification of Convolvulus L. (Convolvulaceae). Planta Med 2010; 76(12): 1203-3.
[14] Anand KK, Srivastava RK, Chaudhary LB, Singh AK. Delimitation of species of the Astragalus rhizanthus complex (Fabaceae) using molecular markers RAPD, ISSR and DAMD. Taiwania 2010; 55(3): 197-207. [http://dx.doi.org/10.6165/tai.2010.55(3).197].
[15] Ince AG, Karaca M. Genetic variation in common bean landraces efficiently revealed by Td-DAMD-PCR markers. Plant Omics 2011; 4(4): 220-7.
[16] Hu JB, Li JW, Wang LJ, et al. Utilization of a set of high-polymorphism DAMD markers for genetic analysis of a cucumber germplasm collection. Acta Physiol Plant 2011; 33(1): 227-31.
[17] Seyedimoradi H, Talebi R, Hassani D, Karami F. Comparative genetic diversity analysis in Iranian local grapevine cultivars using ISSR and DAMD molecular markers. Environ Exp Biol 2012; 10: 125-32.
[18] Srivastava N, Bajpai A, Chandra R, Rajan S, Muthukumar M, Srivastava MK. Comparison of PCR based marker systems for genetic analysis in different cultivars of mango. J Environ Biol 2012; 33(2): 159-66.
[19] Kumar S, Nair KN. Genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships among Indian Citrus taxa revealed by DAMD-PCR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 2013; 60(6): 1777-800.
[20] Pakseresht F, Talebi R, Karami E. Comparative assessment of ISSR, DAMD and SCoT markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of landrace chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes collected from north-west of Iran. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 2013; 19(4): 563-74.
[21] Murty SG, Patel F, Punwar BS, et al. Comparison of RAPD, ISSR, and DAMD markers for genetic giversity assessment between accessions of Tatropha curcas L. and its related species. J Agric Sci Technol 2013; 15(5): 1007-22.
[22] Singh N, Bajpai R, Mahar KS, Tiwari V, Upreti DK, Rana TS. ISSR and DAMD markers revealed high genetic variability within Flavoparmelia caperata in Western Himalaya (India). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 2014; 20(4): 501-8.
[23] Ince AG. karaca M. Td-DAMD-PCR assays for fingerprinting of commercial carnations. Turk J Biol 2015; 39: 290-8.
[24] Pinar H, Bulut M, Altunoz D, et al. Determination of genetic diversity and relationships within Citrus and related genera using DAMD markers. Bangl J Bot 2017; 46(1): 163-70.
[25] Jain JR, Timsina B, Satyan KB, Manohar SH. comparative assessment of morphological and 300 molecular diversity among Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw. accessions in India. 3 Biotech 2017; 7(2): 106-13.
[26] Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 1987; 19: 11-5.
[27] Statsoft Statistica (Data analysis software system), version 6 Statsoft Inc 2003.www.statsoft.com
[28] Jaccard P. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution flora. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat 1908; 44(163): 223-70.
[29] Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 1980; 32(3): 314-31.
[30] Machado CA, Jousselin E, Kjellberg F, Compton SG, Herre EA. Phylogenetic relationships, historical biogeography and character evolution of fig-pollinating wasps. Proc Biol Sci 2001; 268(1468): 685-94.
[31] Salhi-Hannachi A, Chatti K, Saddoud O, et al. Genetic diversity of different Tunisian fig (Ficuscarica L.) collections revealed by RAPD fingerprints. Hereditas 2006; 143(2006): 15-22.